Legal updates and opinions
News / News
A worldwide pandemic – is it time to consider the inclusion of force majeure provisions in loan agreements?
By Cara Gow, Associate; Reneilwe Maleka, Associate and Juliet Siwela, Candidate Attorney
Reviewed by Richard Roothman, Director and Head of the Banking & Finance practice
The previous global financial crisis occurred in 2008/2009 as a result of the subprime mortgage crisis that originated in the USA when house prices started to fall in 2006. The global financial crisis led to a worldwide global recession which in some instances led to payment defaults and breach of financial covenants by borrowers. Lenders typically exercised their rights under loan agreements by calling default and realise their collateral (if any). The Covid-19 pandemic is causing a much worse global economic crisis as a result of a worldwide economic standstill. The impact on borrowers and lenders is certainly much more severe than that experienced during the 2008/2009 global financial crisis. Today corporate and individual borrowers are prevented from fulfilling their repayment obligations as a result of circumstances completely outside their control namely, regulations and directives by Government prohibiting them to trade. One could say, a typical “force majeure” event. It goes without saying that lenders calling default and realising collateral provided in times like this is probably not the preferred route to take.
Force majeure events include war, riots, natural disasters, energy blackouts, lockouts and labour unrest. Loan agreements generally do not include a force majeure provision. In the event of non-payment by borrowers as a result of any of the abovementioned events, lenders would rely on the “material adverse event” clause or any other relevant event of default clause in order to enforce their rights under the loan agreement. The declaration of a lockdown period by Government and the prohibition on trade as a result of Covid-19 do not per se provide relief to borrowers in respect of their repayment obligations.
Is it not time for lenders and borrowers to consider the inclusion of a “force majeure” clause or similar provision in loan agreements to cater for worldwide pandemics such as Covid-19? Under South African law, force majeure provides relief to a party under a contract (the “affected party”) upon the occurrence of an unforeseeable circumstance that prevents the affected party from fulfilling its obligations to the other party under the contract. The inclusion of a force majeure clause in a loan agreement should be carefully considered by a lender and tailored to the lender’s specific requirements. There must be a link (whether directly or indirectly) between the occurrence of the force majeure event and the failure by the borrower to perform.
If included, such clause could specify, inter alia (i) the time period for which relief would be granted, (ii) that the relief period can be extended in the sole discretion of the lender, (iii) the specific provisions in the loan agreement and obligations of the borrower that will continue to apply, (iv) the obligations for which the borrower would get relief, and (v) the process/steps (if any) that must be followed once the relief period has lapsed.
The inclusion of such a provision will allow room for borrowers and lenders to find a way forward and to re-negotiate terms for a specific period of time. Borrowers would be able to obtain payment relief in the form of a payment moratorium or reduced payments for a specified period as well as relief from compliance with certain financial covenants for such relief period. Lenders could rely on a force majeure or similar provision in relation to funding obligations that they may have or to protect them in approving funding for certain projects.
As Covid-19 and the subsequent lockdown has affected and will continue to affect operations and/or revenues of most companies which may result in payment defaults and breach of financial covenants, lenders and borrowers should carefully review existing loan agreements and revisit relevant provisions. With respect to new loan agreements to be concluded, lenders and borrowers may very well consider the inclusion of a force majeure clause or similar provision dealing with the elements referred to above.
Latest News
A Shift in Creditor Protections – The application of Section 34 of the Insolvency Act during Business Rescue Proceedings
Section 34 of the Insolvency Act 24 of 1936 (the "Insolvency Act") has historically safeguarded creditors' interests in South Africa [...]
Tainted treats, spoiled foods and potential dangers…are there any legal safeguards for consumers?
In recent weeks gone by, there have been numerous food poisoning cases reported[1] resulting in serious health issues and, in [...]
Going nowhere fast, proposed amendments to the direct marketing regulations under the CPA published, and your comments are sought!
On October 28, 2024, the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (dtic) published draft amendments to the regulations under the [...]
The Collection of Premiums on Behalf of Insurers – A Look at the Impact of The Exemption of Juristic Representatives from Section 13(1)(C) of FAIS
and Khanyisa Tshoba, Candidate Attorney Introduction: In practice the need may arise for an insurer to appoint a third party [...]
The effects of the CPA Amendment Act, 2017
and Elia Chitata - Candidate Attorney With the introduction of the Restitution of Land Rights Act 22 of 1994, which [...]
Section 22 – A Springboard into Business Rescue
and Caitlin Steytler – Candidate Attorney In August 2024, Statistics South Africa revealed that 1020 entities filed for liquidation in [...]