Legal updates and opinions
Post Author
News / News
Adidas and the stripes
By: Donvay Wegierski, Director
In 2015, Adidas successfully opposed the registration of two EU marks comprising two stripes belonging to Shoe Branding Europe marks on the basis of its three stripe registrations. On appeal, the EU General court has confirmed this position finding it likely that the use of the two-stripe mark will take unfair advantage of the three-stripe registration. This decision may deter the adoption of two stripe variations by others in the EU while Adidas continues to defend its three stripe registrations.
This may differ from the situation in South Africa, in that the Supreme Court of Appeal has found previously that two stripes on shoes had not constituted trade mark infringement or passing off, when the particular shoe was considered.
Latest News
Rising above the flames – answers to directors’ burning questions during times of financial crisis
By Eric Levenstein, Director and Nastascha Harduth, Director Often directors of companies that face financial difficulties have questions which they [...]
The long road to the protection of personal information – No April Fool’s Joke
The Protection of Personal Information Bill was first tabled 12 years ago, in 2009. It was signed into law in [...]
So whose land is it anyway?
By Bulelwa Mabasa, Director and Refilwe Moitse, Associate "We the people of South Africa, declare for all our country and [...]
Questioning the BBBEE commission’s approach to public benefit organisations in BBBEE ownership structures
By Pieter Steyn, Director A Public Benefit Organisation ("PBO") is defined in the Income Tax Act as a non‑profit company [...]
Terminating an employment contract and dismissing an employee – how are they interrelated?
By Bradley Workman-Davies, Director A recent case decided by the South African High Court has examined the curious interplay of [...]
Wereley v productivity south africa: lessons for employers
By Lloyd Abraham, Director On 4 December 2018, the Labour Court in Johannesburg delivered judgment in the matter cited above. [...]
