Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Adidas and the stripes
By: Donvay Wegierski, Director
In 2015, Adidas successfully opposed the registration of two EU marks comprising two stripes belonging to Shoe Branding Europe marks on the basis of its three stripe registrations. On appeal, the EU General court has confirmed this position finding it likely that the use of the two-stripe mark will take unfair advantage of the three-stripe registration. This decision may deter the adoption of two stripe variations by others in the EU while Adidas continues to defend its three stripe registrations.
This may differ from the situation in South Africa, in that the Supreme Court of Appeal has found previously that two stripes on shoes had not constituted trade mark infringement or passing off, when the particular shoe was considered.
Latest News
Probono@Werks
WILLS WEEK - 2018 ProBono.Org hosted a Wills Week from 23 to 27 July 2018. Lawyers from various firms in [...]
South Africa: trade marks as valuable assets to raise funding
By Janine Hollesen and Donvay Wegierski, Directors The registration of trade marks has numerous advantages one of which is that [...]
Labour bills sent for assent
By Jacques Van Wyk, Director and Yusha Davidson, Candidate Attorney The National Minimum Wage Bill, the Basic Conditions of Employment [...]
Can you dismiss an employee for making racist comments in the workplace, which the employee believes to be friendly and inoffensive according to the employee’s culture?
By Jacques van Wyk, Director and Yusha Davidson, Candidate Attorney ISSUE Is the dismissal of an employee, who compares a [...]
Non-standard forms of work and the gig economy
By Bradley Workman-Davies, Director and Megan Livingstone, Candidate Attorney South African labour law creates extensive rights and protections for employees, [...]
Can you dismiss an employee who refuses to adhere to the alternative plan implemented to avoid mass retrenchment?
By Jacques van Wyk, Director and Yusha Davidson, Candidate Attorney ISSUE Is it fair to dismiss an employee for refusing [...]
