Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Affected persons are invited – again – to provide comments on The Code of Conduct for The Banking Association of SA
On 24 June 2022, the Information Regulator of South Africa (Information Regulator) published a notice in terms of section 61(2) of the Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 (POPIA) that it is in receipt of a code of conduct from the Banking Association of South Africa (BASA) that deals with how personal information will be processed in the banking sector.
The above recent notice is a carbon copy of the notice that was published on 11 June 2021 and also issued under section 61(2) of POPIA inviting affected persons to provide comments to the code of conduct.[1]
Have there been any changes to the code of conduct in the interim? No.
We have previously written on the full extent and expanse of the code of conduct, and note that the code outlines the appropriate practices to be followed by members of BASA for the lawful processing of personal information in terms of POPIA.
Whether by choice or necessity, most South African citizens have a bank account or perform financial transactions with banks. The activities range from online shopping to payment of their monthly bills and bank and credit union account management. All these activities involve huge chunks of personal information and often sensitive information.
Accordingly, the code of conduct serves as a significant undertaking by BASA and its members on how the processing of personal information will comply with POPIA. The notice invites affected persons to provide comments to the code of conduct on or before 14 July 2022.
[1] See the notice issued by the Information Regulator on 11 June 2021, accessed on 30 June 2022.
Latest News
Opportunities for private equity in business rescue
By Elliott Wood, Director and Bafana Ntuli, Director On 23 February 2021, the first ever virtual Ansarada DealMakers Annual Awards [...]
Dismissal of employees who contravene a rule will be fair if proven that employees were aware of the rule or could be reasonably expected to have been aware of it
by Jacques van Wyk, Director; Andre van Heerden, Senior Associate; and Lukrisha Ramadu, Candidate Attorney Issue Whether the employees could [...]
Dismissal of employees who participate in unprotected strikes but comply with employer’s ultimatum may not be dismissed
by Jacques van Wyk, Director; Andre van Heerden, Senior Associate; and Lukrisha Ramadu, Candidate Attorney Issue Whether employers, who issue [...]
Temporary Employer/Employee Relief Scheme (“TERS”) extension: appeal process and update
Temporary Employer/Employee Relief Scheme ("TERS") On 27 March 2021 the Unemployment Insurance Fund (”UIF") issued a letter outlining the appeal [...]
Putting the cart before the horse – the potential unconstitutionality of the Expropriation Bill
The Expropriation Bill B3-2020 South Africans have recently been presented with the Expropriation Bill B3-2020 ("the Bill"). While the Bill [...]
What you need to know about the Expropriation Bill and where it came from
by Thomas Karberg, Candidate Attorney reviewed by Bulelwa Mabasa, Director and Head of Land Reform Restitution & Tenure Practice Introduction [...]
