Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Amendments To China’s Trade Mark Laws
By Donvay Wegierski, Director
In April 2019 it was announced that certain Amendments to China’s Trade Mark law will come into effect on 1 November 2019 including:
- Increasing the content against bad-faith registration for the purpose of regulating the acts of bad-faith applications and hoarding registrations otherwise known as “trade mark squatters”.
- Reinforcing the penalties for trade mark infringement.
During the course of 2018 seven million trade mark applications were filed in China with over eighteen million trade marks on the Chinese register belonging to Chinese nationals. The vast number of trade marks filed are indicative of many which are filed and retained in bad faith preventing the rightful proprietors from doing so.
The amendments will introduce measures for the Chinese Trade Mark office to refuse trade mark applications filed in bad faith which are not intended for use and and will no doubt be welcomed by brand owners worldwide. Trade mark proprietors may also include “bad faith registration / not for use” as a basis in trade mark oppositions and invalidations.
If you would like to learn more about Intellectual Property please visit our practice area page.
Latest News
EMPLOYEES MAY APPROACH THE LABOUR COURT DIRECTLY TO ENFORCE THEIR RIGHTS UNDER THE BASIC CONDITIONS OF THE EMPLOYMENT ACT
By Jacques van Wyk, Director; Andre van Heerden, Senior Associate; and Chelsea Roux, Candidate Attorney ISSUE Whether the Labour Court [...]
THE RESTRICTIONS ON A COMMISSIONER TO DEAL WITH A DISPUTE NOT FORMALLY BEFORE HIM
By Jacques van Wyk, Director; Andre van Heerden, Senior Associate; and Chelsea Roux, Candidate Attorney ISSUE Whether the commissioner acted [...]
SECTION 198A(3)(B) DEEMING PROVISION: LIABILITY FOR THE CLIENT EMPLOYER REGARDLESS OF THE ROLE THAT THE EMPLOYER STILL RETAINS
By Jacques van Wyk, Director; Andre van Heerden, Senior Associate; and Chelsea Roux, Candidate Attorney ISSUE In the case of [...]
RESIGNATION WITH IMMEDIATE EFFECT – A TALE OF CONFUSION
By Sandile Tom, Director and Dale Adams, Candidate Attorney It is trite law that certain prescribed periods of notice become [...]
DISMISSED FOR NOT ACCEPTING AN EMPLOYER’S DEMAND – WHEN IS THIS AUTOMATICALLY UNFAIR?
By Bradley Workman-Davies, Director The Labour Relations Act, 66 of 1995 ("LRA"), which generally protects employees in South Africa against [...]
CONDUCT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS BILL
By Tracy-Lee Janse van Rensburg, Director and Reuben Lebelo, Candidate Attorney Following on the Financial Sector Regulation Act, 2017 ("FSR Act"), [...]

