Legal updates and opinions
News / News
An employer’s obligation to comply with their own policies
by Jacques van Wyk, Director, Michiel Heyns, Senior Associate and, Kelly Sease, Candidate Attorney
Issue
Whether an employer is obliged to comply with its own policies and procedures when these policies and procedures are incorporated into an employee’s contract of employment.
POPIA, Employment Contracts and Policies and Procedures
Summary
In the case of Penxa v Beaufort West Municipality and Others [2022] ZALCCT 16 (LC), a Municipal Manager (“the employee“) of the Beaufort West Local Municipality (“Municipality”) was placed on precautionary suspension (referred to as “special leave” by the Municipality) and invited to make written submissions in relation to alleged misconduct, arising from his alleged breach of a code of conduct.
Clause 16 of the employee’s contract of employment provided:
“16. PRECAUTIONARY SUSPENSION
The Municipality may in terms of and subject to the provisions of section 6 of the Disciplinary Regulations suspend the Executive”.
Regulation 6(2) of the Municipality’s Disciplinary Regulations (“Precautionary Suspension“) provided that “[b]efore a senior manager may be suspended, he or she must be given an opportunity to make a written representation to the municipal council why he or she should not be suspended, within seven [7] days of being notified of the council’s decision to suspend him or her.”
The employee took issue with his suspension, arguing that he was not afforded an opportunity to make a written representation to the Municipality as to why he should not be suspended in accordance with Regulation 6(2) of the Disciplinary Regulations.
Conversely, the Municipality contended that the employee was afforded such an opportunity when he was invited to make written submissions in relation to his alleged misconduct and that he rejected this opportunity.
Labour Court findings
The Labour Court found that the invitation to make written submissions in relation to allegations of misconduct had nothing to do with the intention to suspend the employee.
The Court held that the employee and the employer contractually agreed (by way of the employee’s contract of employment) to the process set out in Regulation 6(2). The Precautionary Suspension of the employee was not in line with Regulation 6(2) as he was not afforded an opportunity to make representations as to why he should not be suspended. His suspension was therefore unlawful.
Importance of case
When an employer elects to incorporate policies and procedures into an employee’s contract of employment, the employer elevates those policies and procedures to terms of the agreement and has to comply with these policies and procedures as it has to comply with its contract with the employee. An employer who fails to do so may be found to have acted unlawfully, as opposed to unfairly.
Latest News
As little as possible infringement? Is this the case when thinking about the right to privacy in South Africa?
by Ahmore Burger-Smidt, Director and Head of the Data Privacy practice A year back there would have been a massive [...]
Some more exemptions from Competition Law during the pandemic
Competition Law during the pandemic We have previously reported on the various block exemptions issued by the Minister of Trade, [...]
New directions, regulations and a Labour Court judgment bring clarity to the mining industry
by Chris Stevens, Director and Head of the Mining, Environmental & Resources practice; Kathleen Louw, Director; Bronwyn Parker, Senior Associate; [...]
The impact of COVID-19 on the use of common areas
by Fátima Rodrigues, Director and Head of the Property Law & Real Estate practice (Johannesburg) and Yatheen Ramnath, Candidate Attorney [...]
Cancellations and postponements of dividends
by Kevin Trudgeon, Director; Brian Price, Director; and Raquel Goncalves, Candidate Attorney The COVID-19 outbreak, the subsequent lockdown and other [...]
A jack of all trades or jacking the trades of others: A case of having your fingers burnt in too many pies
National Union of Metal Workers Of South Africa V Lufil Packaging (Isithebe) (A Division Of Bidvest Paperplus (Pty) Limited) (Unreported) [...]
