Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Can you copy a product of someone else?
By Janine Hollesen, Director
This question was all over social media and media reports when the owner of Ubuntu Baba used the power of social media to bring to the attention of the South African public, its copying allegations against Woolworths in relation to a baby carrier. This again illustrates the legs which social media has to carry a story of this nature.
The bottom line is that it is not unlawful to copy another person’s product or idea, provided that it is not protected by a form of intellectual property, such as patents, designs, copyright, trade marks or in the get-up of the product.
This issue has been more fully dealt with in our Legal Werks article which can be found here.
Latest News
Working from home but are you really at work?
by Sandile July, Director and Nyiko Mathebula, Candidate Attorney COVID-19 has revolutionised the workplace in terms of health and safety [...]
Proposed amendments to The Financial Intelligence Centre Act, 2001
by Tracy-Lee Janse van Rensburg, Director On 19 June 2020[1], the Minister of Finance published proposed amendments to Schedules 1, 2 and 3 to the [...]
Guidance on outsourcing of compliance activities to third parties
by Tracy-Lee Janse van Rensburg, Director and Juliet Siwela, Candidate Attorney On 21 July 2020, the Financial Intelligence Centre ("FIC") published the [...]
Additional obligations for designated employers under The Employment Equity Act
by Bradley Workman-Davies, Director A recent bill submitted to Parliament for consideration would seek to impose potentially stringent new quotas [...]
The effect of divorce and remarriage on a Will: SA and UK perspective
by Rachel Winterbach, Candidate Attorney reviewed by Doelie Lessing, Director This article compares the legal position that applies in the [...]
The deductibility of BBBEE expenditure – Binding Class Ruling 72
by Kyle Fyfe, Senior Associatereviewed by Ernest Mazansky, Head of Tax Practice SARS has recently issued Binding Class Ruling 72 [...]
