Legal updates and opinions
News / News
CANNABIS REMAINS ABUZZ
By Donvay Wegierski, Director
An adult may possess and use cannabis in private for personal consumption in South Africa. This is according to the South African Constitutional Court ruling in September 2018 wherein it found that certain provisions of the Drugs and Drug Trafficking Act and the Medicines and Related Substances Act infringe upon the right to Privacy.
While the commercial sale of cannabis remains illegal in South Africa this playing field appears to be changing fast. Earlier this year the City of Cape Town announced that it will be releasing vacant land for the production of medical cannabis and further research is a bold step, anticipating an initial capital investment of over R600 million for the construction of phase one with over a further R1 billion anticipated by phase two, projected within the next four years.
Recent press releases state that a company, which will produce cannabis on a farm near Stellenbosch in the Western Cape has been granted a licence by the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority having applied in 2017.
And brand owners are taking note. The opportunities to create new brands for cannabis-based products appear endless and so too should the requisite protection of intellectual property protection be in place in the territories and, in respect of trade marks, classes of relevance.
Canada is the first G-7 country allowing the legal consumption of recreational cannabis having passed the Cannabis Act on 21 June 2018 regulating the growth, distribution and sale of recreational cannabis in Canada.
The Canadian Trade Mark Office is also handling a few thousand trade marks covering cannabis. In June 2019, Canada’s requirement to prove “use” to register a trade mark was removed and it is likely that the office is experiencing a flurry.
Although the USA still regards the use and sale of cannabis as illegal under Federal Law, with nine states and Washington DC permitting the recreational use of cannabis, absolute prohibition in those states has effectively stopped. Benefits shown by the use of medical marijuana is a large contributor to this change.
Regardless of the Territory, two principles should be kept in mind when choosing a trade mark:
- The trade mark should not be contrary to public policy (contra bonos mores) or likely to give offence to any class of persons; and
- A trade mark should not be descriptive of the kind of quality or other characteristics of the product.
Latest News
NO MANDATORY REQUIREMENT FOR SOUTH AFRICANS TO JOIN FUND UNDER NHI BILL AS CURRENTLY PROPOSED
By Neil Kirby, Director The publication of the National Health Insurance Bill [B11-2009] has resulted in much public comment as [...]
THE LAW ON LAND INVASION
By Anele Ngidi, Director Land invasions have become an all too familiar fixture of our daily headlines. Images of occupiers [...]
HAUNTED BY THE PAST … UNTIL WHEN SHOULD HISTORIC CARTEL CONDUCT SPOOK YOU?
By Rudolph Raath, Director and Megan Livingstone COMPETITION COMMISSION V PICKFORDS REMOVAL (167/CAC/Jul18) How long does a firm remain at [...]
ARE YOUR CONTRACTS WITH SUPPLIERS / CONTRACTORS SUFFICIENT TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH POPIA?
By Tebogo Sibidla, Director and Kirsten Whitworth, Senior Associate In anticipation of the coming into operation of the Protection of [...]
SUPERMAC VS MCDONALDS – THE TRADE MARK BATTLE CONTINUES
By Donvay Wegierski, Director The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) has partially cancelled McDonald's EU trade mark registration for [...]
PROPOSED TIGHTENING OF THE ANTI-DIVIDEND STRIPPING PROVISIONS
By Erich Bell, Director and Ryan Damon, Candidate Attorney During 2017 and 2018, several changes pertaining to the tax treatment [...]

