Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Changes to the tax treatment of trust income awarded to foreign beneficiaries on the horizon
Currently, income that arises in a South African trust which is awarded to a foreign beneficiary during the same tax year is disregarded in the South African trust. It is being proposed that such income be taxed in the hands of the South African trust, even if awarded to a foreign beneficiary during the same tax year.
Current Legal Position
Currently, income that arises in a South African trust and that is awarded to a trust beneficiary during the same tax year in which the income arose is not taxed in the trust, but in the hands of the beneficiary, irrespective of whether the trust beneficiary is a South African tax resident or a non-South African tax resident.
This contrasts with SARS’s view of the tax treatment of capital gains that are derived by a South African trust, and which are awarded to a trust beneficiary during the same tax year. According to SARS in Annexure C of the 2023 Budget Review, if a capital gain is awarded to a trust beneficiary, the gain will only flow through to, and be taxable in the hands of, that beneficiary if the beneficiary is a South African tax resident. Where the trust beneficiary is a non-South African tax resident, the capital gain will be “trapped”, and SARS will seek to tax the gain in the hands of the South African trust. This view of SARS has been challenged and the jury is still out on the correct position. Should the SARS view prevail, capital gains awarded to foreign beneficiaries are subject to a tax rate of 36%, compared to capital gains awarded to South African tax resident beneficiaries who are natural persons and who are subject to tax at a maximum rate of 18%.
Proposed Amendments
National Treasury has grown concerned with the perceived different tax treatment of income amounts and capital gains awarded to foreign beneficiaries.
National Treasury in Annexure C of the Budget Review states that “the [flow-through] of amounts from South African tax resident trusts to non-resident beneficiaries makes it difficult for SARS to collect income tax from those non-resident beneficiaries as it is more complicated to enforce recovery actions against non-residents.”
Consequently, it is proposed that the provisions relating to income be aligned with those applicable to capital gains (as interpreted by SARS) so that income that is awarded to a South African tax resident beneficiary in the same tax year will continue to be taxable in the beneficiary’s hands on the flow-through basis, but that any income that is awarded to a foreign beneficiary will be “trapped”, and taxed, in the hands of the South African trust.
The effect of the proposed amendment would be that any income that accrues to or is received by a South African trust, and that is awarded to a foreign beneficiary during the same tax year will be taxed in the hands of the South African trust at a flat rate of 45%.
The potential implications of the proposed amendment will be far-reaching for South African tax resident trusts and their foreign beneficiaries, and the impact thereof will have to be considered in more detail once the final legislation has been introduced in future legislative cycles. Considering National Treasury’s rationale for the proposal, in our view, the proposed amendment is drastic, especially since the foreign beneficiary may be subject to tax in the foreign jurisdiction where he or she is tax resident, without the benefit of a foreign tax credit for the tax paid by the South African trust.
Our Tax lawyers rank among the world’s best, visit our Tax Practice Area.
Latest News
The metaverse and data privacy: Will regulation keep up?
What is the metaverse? On 28 October 2021, Facebook Inc.'s chief executive officer Mark Zuckerberg announced the rebranding of his [...]
The PAIA and POPIA dichotomy: What information are you requesting?
Promotion of Access to Information Act, 2 of 2000 We have received numerous queries from clients seeking advice on attending [...]
Security for costs – A White Elephant? A Chimera? Pie in the sky? …On any basis a Herculean task
Security for costs In the recent case of McHugh N.O. & Others v Wright [5641/2021) [2021] ZAWCHC 205 (19 October [...]
Merger approval without a specific acquiring or target firm
Merger approval The Competition Act 89 of 1998 ("Competition Act") and Commission Rules[1] contain review provisions that establish a mandatory [...]
Data protection impact assessment required despite “Might of the State”
Kenyan High Court Introduction On 14 October 2021, the Kenyan High Court declared the collection of biometric information and the [...]
Relief from oppressive or prejudicial conduct in terms of the Companies Act 71 of 2008
Section 163 of the Companies Act 71 of 2008 In any corporate environment, the authority of the board of directors, [...]
