Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Contracts of temporary employment services employees
National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa obo Nkala and others v Durpo Workforce Solutions [2016] 3 BALR 229 (MEIBC)
ISSUE
Whether the contracts of employment of temporary employment service (“TES”) employees will transfer to the client of the TES in terms of section 198A of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 if the employees have been utilised by the client for a period in excess of three months.
COURT’S DECISION
In the case of National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa obo Nkala and others v Durpo Workforce Solutions [2016] 3 BALR 229 (MEIBC), the employees were placed by the TES to work for the TES’s client. The employees lodged a dispute in terms of section 198D seeking an order that they had been transferred to the client by virtue of section 198A and should now be regarded as permanent employees of the client. The respondents contended that if the employees were to be granted the order, they would be worse off as they would have to start afresh on new employment contracts with the client, and would thus lose their years of service with the TES. The Commissioner relied on Assign Services (Pty) Ltd v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration and others [2015] 11 BLLR 1160 (LC) (“Assign Services”), and held that for the purposes of all labour legislation, save for the LRA, the TES remained the employer of placed employees. In Assign Services the court had to decide whether the deeming provision (section 198A) meant that there was a dual employment relationship between the TES and the client. The court found that the deeming provision does not create a substitution of parties, but rather that the client is a concurrent employer with the TES after the 3 month period of employment. In conclusion the court held that there was no basis in law to grant the applicants the order, and the dispute was accordingly dismissed.
IMPORTANCE OF THIS CASE
This case serves to reiterate the principle of Assign Services, namely that only for the purposes of the LRA will an employee be deemed an employee of both the TES and the client. For all other labour related legislation the employee will remain the employee of the TES.
Click on the link if you’ like to more information on Werksmans expertise in the Labour & Employment sector.
Latest News
Fixed term faux pas – how not to employ someone for a limited period of time
By Bradley Workman-Davies, Director Fixed term contracts of employment are allowable and acceptable in South African employment law, and are [...]
Crypto assets – a new financial product?
By Natalie Scott, Director; and Kyra South, Associate On 20 November 2020, the Financial Sector Conduct Authority ("FSCA") published a draft Declaration [...]
Covid-19 Beach Closures
by Shayne Krige, Director and Co-Head of Investment Funds & Private Equity Practice We have been inundated with queries from [...]
WhatsApp, a misconceived menace to society?
by Ahmore Burger-Smidt, Director and Head of Data Privacy Practice and member of Competition Law Practice; and Dale Adams, Candidate [...]
LRA Section 189A (13) applications: is the court guardian or nanny?
by Lloyd Abraham, Director The Broadcasting Electronic Media and Allied Workers' Union (BEMAWU) recently launched an urgent application in the [...]
Banking on a resignation with immediate effect? Don’t count on it!
by Sandile July, Director and Lisa Appelgryn, Senior Associate: Labour & Employment Practice The Labour Appeal Court ("LAC") in the [...]
