Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Contracts of temporary employment services employees
National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa obo Nkala and others v Durpo Workforce Solutions [2016] 3 BALR 229 (MEIBC)
ISSUE
Whether the contracts of employment of temporary employment service (“TES”) employees will transfer to the client of the TES in terms of section 198A of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 if the employees have been utilised by the client for a period in excess of three months.
COURT’S DECISION
In the case of National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa obo Nkala and others v Durpo Workforce Solutions [2016] 3 BALR 229 (MEIBC), the employees were placed by the TES to work for the TES’s client. The employees lodged a dispute in terms of section 198D seeking an order that they had been transferred to the client by virtue of section 198A and should now be regarded as permanent employees of the client. The respondents contended that if the employees were to be granted the order, they would be worse off as they would have to start afresh on new employment contracts with the client, and would thus lose their years of service with the TES. The Commissioner relied on Assign Services (Pty) Ltd v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration and others [2015] 11 BLLR 1160 (LC) (“Assign Services”), and held that for the purposes of all labour legislation, save for the LRA, the TES remained the employer of placed employees. In Assign Services the court had to decide whether the deeming provision (section 198A) meant that there was a dual employment relationship between the TES and the client. The court found that the deeming provision does not create a substitution of parties, but rather that the client is a concurrent employer with the TES after the 3 month period of employment. In conclusion the court held that there was no basis in law to grant the applicants the order, and the dispute was accordingly dismissed.
IMPORTANCE OF THIS CASE
This case serves to reiterate the principle of Assign Services, namely that only for the purposes of the LRA will an employee be deemed an employee of both the TES and the client. For all other labour related legislation the employee will remain the employee of the TES.
Click on the link if you’ like to more information on Werksmans expertise in the Labour & Employment sector.
Latest News
Paint-by-numbers: Competition law litigation against Google and Meta
Online Intermediation Platforms Market Inquiry Is it with bated breath that one should await the outcome of the Online Intermediation [...]
Is South Africa in a state of procurement limbo? Where to from here, for now?
Public procurement in South Africa by Sarah Moerane, Director, and Koketso Rapoo, Candidate Attorney Public procurement in South Africa is [...]
Putting Directors on Notice! – Section 129(7) of the Companies Act
Section 129(7) of the Companies Act The often "overlooked" Section and its meaning for directors of financially distressed companies by [...]
Market Inquiry: South African Fresh Produce Market
by Ahmore Burger-Smidt, Director and Head of Data Privacy and Cybercrime Practice and member of the Competition Law Practice and [...]
Employer may fairly dismiss employees for refusing to accept operational changes in the context of restructuring
Refusing to accept operational changes in the context of restructuring Explanatory Note Generally, the dismissal of employees to coerce them [...]
Update: Prevention and Elimination of Harassment in the Workplace
The Harassment Code by Jacques van Wyk, Director; Andre van Heerden, Senior Associate; and Danelle Plaatjies, Candidate Attorney Introduction On [...]