Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Corporate Social Responsibility embraces Humanity as SA works to flatten the curve – but beware scammers
By Donvay Wegierski, Director
Many companies have long engaged in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) programmes involving sustainability, ethics and social impact that aim to give back to society. South African business is no different and, now more than ever, CSR is a must have for businesses wanting to protect their brand during the Corona pandemic.
Perhaps, the real brand risk currently is for business not to act.
Society expects business to help and many South African businesses are doing so despite market uncertainty and the expense involved.
Notwithstanding the race for scientists to formulate a vaccination we are seeing motor vehicle and weapon manufacturers making ventilators; clothing and fabric producers manufacturing masks and face shields; telecom service providers are providing more wireless and mobile data; there are many new and free of charge e-schooling platforms and audio books; online tutorials are free; news channels are available subscription free; banking charges are being waived; feeding schemes are increasing. We will long remember those who are giving back.
However, because of the prevalence of initiatives to help, fraudsters are preying on the goodwill of people.
Unfortunately as we heed the call to stay at home and flatten the curve our online activity has increased. And with it, an increase in cybercrime, phishing and general criminal activity luring people to donate to fake causes, to click on phishing links and buy fake or counterfeit goods.
There has also been a particularly sharp rise in counterfeit pharmaceuticals and protective gear. Worldwide shortages of protective gear has seen a proliferation of fake products. One such example are “N95” masks (being a US certification) available online and subsequently pulled from India, Pakistan and numerous other countries.
Understandably fake or inadequate products place lives at risk therefore the origin and credibility of the website from which products are purchased should be treated with caution. In an effort for brand owners to combat trade mark infringement and counterfeit product the following measures could be considered:
- Google Alerts or anti-counterfeiting services which flag the unauthorised use of brand names;
- Trade mark watching services can be implemented or increased;
- Consider anti-counterfeiting partnerships with likeminded business;
- Educate and inform customers online by including listings of legitimate retailers, posting photographs of genuine product and encouraging reporting of fake or unauthorised product;
- Continue to maintain and protect brands locally and abroad – register and maintain trade marks and domain names, in South Africa and other countries.
Latest News
The impact of Mitchell judgement on purchases of immovable property from an insolvent estate
In a recent judgement, of City Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality v PJ Mitchell (38/2015) (2015) ZASCA, the Supreme Court of Appeal ruled that [...]
Tread carefully when merging: tribunal imposes massive fine for failure to notify
In the intricate process of acquiring another business or forming a joint venture, firms often forget to check whether the [...]
The duty to disclose business rescue proceedings
On 14 April 2016, the Supreme Court of Appeal (“SCA”) in the matter of Umso Construction Proprietary Limited (“Umso”) v MEC [...]
Spotlight on boards and shareholder activism
INTRODUCTION Corporate activism places public pressure on boards to improve both financial and non-financial performance of companies. Non-financial performance [...]
New treatment of fractional entitlements in terms of the JSE listings requirements
A recent change to the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) Listings Requirements, which deals with the manner in which entitlements to [...]
Strike action in circumstances where there has been a long delay between the issuing of a certificate of outcome and the subsequent election to embark on a strike
PRASA t/a Metrorail v SATAWU and Others (C190/2016) ISSUE Whether a strike is protected in circumstances where there has [...]
