Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Corroborative evidence is required to establish intoxication
By: Jacques van Wyk, Director, Andre van Heerden, Senior Associate and, Unathi Jukuda, Candidate Attorney
ISSUE
Whether an employer can dismiss an employee who fails a breathalyser test in circumstances where there is no corroborative evidence to prove that the employee was intoxicated to the extent that he was incapable of performing his/her duties?
SUMMARY
A positive test result on a breathalyser test is not sufficient proof to indicate that the employee was under the influence of alcohol to the extent that he or she was incapable of performing his / her duties. The real test is whether the employee’s competence to perform his / her work has been impaired. If this is the case, it may be substantively fair to dismiss the employee.
COURT’S DECISION
In the case of South African Transport and Allied Workers’ Union obo Mmotong / Staffing Logistics (2018) 27 NBCRFLI 8.37.2 the Commissioner for the National Bargaining Council for the Road Freight and Logistics Industry had to consider this issue. Mr Benny Mmotong (“the employee“) was employed by Staffing Logistics (“the employer“).The employee was dismissed after a breathalyser test indicated that he had consumed alcohol. The employer claimed that it handled fragile goods and accordingly had adopted a zero-tolerance policy to mitigate against risks posed by intoxication at the workplace. The employee was called before a disciplinary enquiry where he admitted guilt. The employee, in his defence, argued that he had consumed alcohol on the previous day and that he was unaware of his employer’s policy on alcohol.
The Commissioner noted that it is generally accepted that breathalyser tests are less accurate than blood tests. As a result, if an employer wishes to rely on the results of a breathalyser test to prove an employee was intoxicated on duty, they should also provide further corroborating evidence such as manner of speech, the existence of bloodshot eyes and unsteadiness.
In addition, the Commissioner relied on the case of Tanker Services (Pty) Ltd v Magudulela 1997 12 BLLR 1552 (LAC) where the Labour Appeal Court held that the important factor is the employee’s competence to perform their work has been impaired. In this case the employee was able to perform his tasks and the court held that the dismissal was substantively unfair.
The commissioner noted that the employer led no evidence to prove that the employee was so intoxicated that he was incapable of performing his duties. Furthermore, the employer failed to submit its disciplinary code to indicate that the offence was described widely enough to encompass a zero-tolerance policy.
The Commissioner held that the employee’s dismissal was substantively unfair and reinstated the employee with retrospective effect.
IMPORTANCE OF THIS CASE
This case highlights that employers must make employees aware of their policy on alcohol in the workplace. Importantly, where an employee fails a breathalyser test, additional evidence of the employee’s inability to perform their functions as a result of being intoxicated must be presented to substantiate the employee’s dismissal.
If you would like to learn more about Labour & Employment please visit our practice area page.
Latest News
To interdict or not to interdict: Parties continue to fall in the same pitfalls
Securing an interdict It has long been held, per Loomcraft Fabrics CC v Nedbank Ltd and another [1996] 1 All [...]
Can a Business Rescue Practitioner and a Curator Bonis hold hands?
The recent High Court judgment in National Director of Public Prosecutions v Knoop N.O and others; National Director of Public [...]
The Rise in Responsible and ESG Investment
ESG Framework by Natalie Scott, Director, and Janice Geel, Candidate Attorney The King IV Report on Corporate Governance for South [...]
When is Disclosure Voluntary for VDP Relief?
Voluntary Disclosure Programme (VDP) The Voluntary Disclosure Programme (VDP) is a disclosure programme that allows taxpayers to come forward on [...]
UPDATE | Important Notice for Kenya Imports (Recordation)
Mandatory Recordation of Intellectual Property Rights as of 1 July 2022 "deadline extended to 1 January 2023" Kenya's Anti-Counterfeit (Recordation) [...]
National Land Reform Summit considers new modes of landholding tenure
Deputy President David Mabuza leading Inter-Ministerial Committee on land reform convened the Communal Land Administration and Tenure Summit on 27 [...]