Legal updates and opinions
News / News
DMRE issues directives on mining sector, in line with requirements of Section 5(1) of the Mine Health And Safety Act, 29 of 1996
by Chris Stevens, Director and Head of the Mining, Environmental and Resources practice; Kathleen Louw, Director; and Bronwyn Parker, Senior Associate
- On 23 April 2020, and as the South African mining sector prepares to ramp up to 50% of capacity, the Department of Minerals and Energy (“DMRE”) issued the directive (“the 23 April 2020 Directive”) which contains the steps the DMRE believes are necessary to ensure safe start-up processes and procedures. The directive does not appear to be an amendment to the Regulations terms of section 27(2) of the Disaster Management Act, 2002 (“the Disaster Management Act”) and its exact legal status is unclear.
- The directive is issued in line with the employer’s obligations, as set out in section 5 of the Mine Health and Safety Act 29 of 1996 (“MHSA”), obliges an employer “to maintain healthy and safe mine environment“. When implementing this section, employers are however only required to do that which is “as far as reasonably practicable“. The approach to the implementation of the 23 April 2020 Directive, seems to be similar, which is helpful to employers under the current circumstances as it recognises that employers cannot be expected to implement measures that are not possible.
- The 23 April 2020 Directive must be read in conjunction with Regulations GN318 of March 2020, as amended and issued in terms of Section 27(2) of the Disaster Management Act and the sector specific directions, published by the DMRE in Government Gazette 43227 on 11 April 2020. The directive states the following:
31. mining companies must, in consultation with labour unions in the respective operations, develop the start-up procedure, and provide a copy of such procedure to the Department, prior to ramp-up of operations;
3.2 the start-up procedures must address measures to be taken to prevent the spread of COVID-19, as well as actions to provide a safe working environment, especially following the prolonged closure of certain operations. These measures should include:
3.2.1 Rigorous screening of all employees, including contractors, prior to accessing the mine;
3.2.2 Testing of employees with symptoms of Covid-19;
3.2.3 Adequate social distancing;
3.2.4 Provision of quarantine facilities for employees showing signs of COVID-19;
3.2.5 Establishment and maintenance of a personal hygiene programme; and
3.2.6 Provision of appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) including face masks.
3.3 the directive also encourages employers to systematically phase in workers at the mines. - In its press release regarding the directive, the DMRE reiterates that it would continue with scheduled and unannounced visits to mining operations to monitor compliance with the lockdown regulations, guiding principles on prevention and management of Covid-19, as well as each mines’ start-up procedure.
- Please contact the Werksmans mining team should you have any questions around the implementation of the Disaster Management Act, 2002 and associated Regulations.
Latest News
Section 12A(3)(e) – Is it really all about promoting HDP or worker ownership?
by Graeme Wickins, Director Section 12A(3)(e) of the Competition Act Much has been written about the hyper-focus the Competition Commission [...]
Bid rigging vs price fixing: Clarification on when you will be deemed to have exited a cartel
Understanding what is exactly required to demonstrate that a company has distanced itself from a cartel is undoubtedly of great [...]
When must your medical scheme pay for treatment?
by Helen Michael, Director and, Raisah Mahomed, Candidate Attorney On 26 August 2022, the High Court in Pretoria handed down [...]
Not every crime is a cybercrime – The dichotomy of cyber-enabled crimes and cybercrimes
The global adoption of digital technology is rapidly increasing, which increase has caused an evolution in criminal behaviour resulting in [...]
Breaking set stone – exceptional circumstances and the variation of Competition orders
by Ahmore Burger-Smidt, Director and Head of Data Privacy and Cybercrime Practice and member of the Competition Law Practice, and [...]
The Constitutional Court has tightened the noose on the doctrine of common purpose.
by Sandile July, Director, Sandile Tom, Director and, Benedict Ngobeni, Candidate Attorney Doctrine of common purpose The principles underpinning the [...]