Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Draft Amendments to the Pension Funds Act 24 of 1956: The Highlights
by Natalie Scott, Director and Kyra South, Associate
On Friday, 26 February 2021, the National Treasury released a Media Statement regarding the publication of the draft amendments (“Draft Amendments“) to Regulation 28 of the Pension Funds Act Regulations, 1962 (as amended) (“Regulations“), published under the Pension Funds Act 24 of 1956 (“Act“).
Regulation 28 of the Regulations requires asset managers to, inter alia, make (i) sustainable, (ii) responsible and (iii) transparent investments when dealing with Funds (defined in section 1 of the Act) (“Objectives“). In order to achieve the Objectives and to ensure that asset portfolios are appropriately diversified, asset managers are required to spread assets across a number of different asset classes (which classes are listed in table 1 under Regulation 28 of the Regulations).
The Draft Amendments seek to, inter alia, encourage asset managers to increase investments in infrastructure projects (and to bridge the existing infrastructure gap) by:
- including specific definitions for ‘infrastructure’ and ‘hedge fund’;
- segregating ‘hedge funds’, ‘private equity’ and ‘any other assets not listed in this schedule’ (“New Asset Classes“); and
- allocating specific limits for each of the New Asset Classes.
Under the Draft Amendments, a separate ‘infrastructure’ asset class has not been created. Instead, references to ‘infrastructure’ have been included in, inter alia, new Regulation 28(2)(c)(x) as a principle with which Funds are required to comply when making investment decisions.
Comments on the Draft Amendments are required to be submitted to Mr Basil Maseko at the National Treasury at retirement.reform@treasury.gov.za by no later than 29 March 2021.
Latest News
The metaverse and data privacy: Will regulation keep up?
What is the metaverse? On 28 October 2021, Facebook Inc.'s chief executive officer Mark Zuckerberg announced the rebranding of his [...]
The PAIA and POPIA dichotomy: What information are you requesting?
Promotion of Access to Information Act, 2 of 2000 We have received numerous queries from clients seeking advice on attending [...]
Security for costs – A White Elephant? A Chimera? Pie in the sky? …On any basis a Herculean task
Security for costs In the recent case of McHugh N.O. & Others v Wright [5641/2021) [2021] ZAWCHC 205 (19 October [...]
Merger approval without a specific acquiring or target firm
Merger approval The Competition Act 89 of 1998 ("Competition Act") and Commission Rules[1] contain review provisions that establish a mandatory [...]
Data protection impact assessment required despite “Might of the State”
Kenyan High Court Introduction On 14 October 2021, the Kenyan High Court declared the collection of biometric information and the [...]
Relief from oppressive or prejudicial conduct in terms of the Companies Act 71 of 2008
Section 163 of the Companies Act 71 of 2008 In any corporate environment, the authority of the board of directors, [...]
