Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Draft Amendments to the Pension Funds Act 24 of 1956: The Highlights
by Natalie Scott, Director and Kyra South, Associate
On Friday, 26 February 2021, the National Treasury released a Media Statement regarding the publication of the draft amendments (“Draft Amendments“) to Regulation 28 of the Pension Funds Act Regulations, 1962 (as amended) (“Regulations“), published under the Pension Funds Act 24 of 1956 (“Act“).
Regulation 28 of the Regulations requires asset managers to, inter alia, make (i) sustainable, (ii) responsible and (iii) transparent investments when dealing with Funds (defined in section 1 of the Act) (“Objectives“). In order to achieve the Objectives and to ensure that asset portfolios are appropriately diversified, asset managers are required to spread assets across a number of different asset classes (which classes are listed in table 1 under Regulation 28 of the Regulations).
The Draft Amendments seek to, inter alia, encourage asset managers to increase investments in infrastructure projects (and to bridge the existing infrastructure gap) by:
- including specific definitions for ‘infrastructure’ and ‘hedge fund’;
- segregating ‘hedge funds’, ‘private equity’ and ‘any other assets not listed in this schedule’ (“New Asset Classes“); and
- allocating specific limits for each of the New Asset Classes.
Under the Draft Amendments, a separate ‘infrastructure’ asset class has not been created. Instead, references to ‘infrastructure’ have been included in, inter alia, new Regulation 28(2)(c)(x) as a principle with which Funds are required to comply when making investment decisions.
Comments on the Draft Amendments are required to be submitted to Mr Basil Maseko at the National Treasury at retirement.reform@treasury.gov.za by no later than 29 March 2021.
Latest News
Wereley v productivity south africa: lessons for employers
By Lloyd Abraham, Director On 4 December 2018, the Labour Court in Johannesburg delivered judgment in the matter cited above. [...]
Three cartel cases lost by the competition commission before the competition tribunal – what are the implications for future cases?
By Pieter Steyn, Director In the last two months the Competition Commission has lost three cartel cases before the Competition [...]
ROYAL IP
By Donvay Wegierski, Director Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have announced that they are stepping down as "senior royals". This [...]
PARENTAL LEAVE BENEFITS: NEW REGULATIONS TO THE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE ACT 63 OF 2001
By Jacques van Wyk, Director; Andre van Heerden, Senior Associate; and Chelsea Roux, Candidate Attorney On 4 November 2019 the [...]
EMPLOYEES MAY APPROACH THE LABOUR COURT DIRECTLY TO ENFORCE THEIR RIGHTS UNDER THE BASIC CONDITIONS OF THE EMPLOYMENT ACT
By Jacques van Wyk, Director; Andre van Heerden, Senior Associate; and Chelsea Roux, Candidate Attorney ISSUE Whether the Labour Court [...]
THE RESTRICTIONS ON A COMMISSIONER TO DEAL WITH A DISPUTE NOT FORMALLY BEFORE HIM
By Jacques van Wyk, Director; Andre van Heerden, Senior Associate; and Chelsea Roux, Candidate Attorney ISSUE Whether the commissioner acted [...]
