Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Earnings threshold increase for 2022
Annual earnings threshold increase for 2022
The Basic Conditions of Employment Act 75 of 1997 (“BCEA“) empowers the Minister of Employment and Labour to make determinations, from time to time, regarding an earnings threshold.
The effect of such determinations is that employees earning in excess of the threshold amount stipulated in the determination are excluded from relying on numerous protections in the BCEA.
On the other hand, employees earning below the earnings threshold enjoy protections in the BCEA relating to the regulation of ordinary hours of work, overtime, compressed working weeks, averaging of hours of work, meal intervals, daily and weekly rest periods, pay for work on Sundays, pay for night work and public holidays.
They also enjoy some protections in the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 relating to the regulation of non-standard employment (for example: employees who work for the client of a temporary employment service or labour broker; and employees who are employed on fixed-term contracts). Additionally, employees or workers earning below the threshold amount may refer claims for non-payment in terms of section 73A of the BCEA to the CCMA.
With effect from 1 March 2022, the earnings threshold has been increased by the Minister to R224 080.48 per annum (which amounts to R18 673.37 per month).
Before this increase, the previous earnings threshold was R211 596.30 (or R17 633.03 per month).
It is important to note that the word “earnings” as it applies in this context means an employee’s regular annual remuneration before deductions (such as income tax, contributions to a pension/provident fund and/or medical aid scheme and similar payments), but excludes similar contributions made by the employer in respect of the employee. Further exclusions in this regard include subsistence and travel allowances, achievement awards and overtime.
Latest News
SAFM Market Update: Cross Trainer Enters Business Rescue
Dr. Eric Levenstein, Director and Head of our Insolvency & Business Rescue practice area, had a discussion with Jimmy [...]
When Three Legal Planets Align… WhatsApp Must Pay a $220 000 000.00 Fine
The Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission ("Commission"), being the foremost agency in Nigeria, responsible for the promotion, protection, and [...]
Waive Goodbye to Uncertainty: Phoenix Salt Industries (Pty) Ltd v The Lubavitch Foundation of Southern Africa
and Laeeqah Kassiem, Candidate Attorney This article discusses the judgement of Phoenix Salt Industries (Pty) Ltd v The Lubavitch Foundation [...]
Mr. Pty Ltd, You Have a Right to Privacy!
When thinking about the Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 ("POPIA") individuals often, mistakenly so, think about the [...]
Section 54 – Still a Bar to the Commencement of Mining Activity?
On 5 December 2018, Werksmans published an article on the Constitutional Court Judgment: CCT 265/17 Maledu v Itereleng Bakgatla Mineral [...]
Do Androids Dream of Unfair Dismissal?
A federal judge in California recently considered an employment discrimination claim that involved AI. Even though it considered specific circumstances [...]