Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Earnings threshold increase for 2022
Annual earnings threshold increase for 2022
The Basic Conditions of Employment Act 75 of 1997 (“BCEA“) empowers the Minister of Employment and Labour to make determinations, from time to time, regarding an earnings threshold.
The effect of such determinations is that employees earning in excess of the threshold amount stipulated in the determination are excluded from relying on numerous protections in the BCEA.
On the other hand, employees earning below the earnings threshold enjoy protections in the BCEA relating to the regulation of ordinary hours of work, overtime, compressed working weeks, averaging of hours of work, meal intervals, daily and weekly rest periods, pay for work on Sundays, pay for night work and public holidays.
They also enjoy some protections in the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 relating to the regulation of non-standard employment (for example: employees who work for the client of a temporary employment service or labour broker; and employees who are employed on fixed-term contracts). Additionally, employees or workers earning below the threshold amount may refer claims for non-payment in terms of section 73A of the BCEA to the CCMA.
With effect from 1 March 2022, the earnings threshold has been increased by the Minister to R224 080.48 per annum (which amounts to R18 673.37 per month).
Before this increase, the previous earnings threshold was R211 596.30 (or R17 633.03 per month).
It is important to note that the word “earnings” as it applies in this context means an employee’s regular annual remuneration before deductions (such as income tax, contributions to a pension/provident fund and/or medical aid scheme and similar payments), but excludes similar contributions made by the employer in respect of the employee. Further exclusions in this regard include subsistence and travel allowances, achievement awards and overtime.
Latest News
Conciliations and the importance of maintaining impartiality
and Tasreeq Ferreira, Candidate Attorney Issue Whether comments made by a commissioner in conciliation proceedings could give rise to a [...]
When reinstatement is not permissible
and Kelly Sease, Candidate Attorney In terms of section 193(1) of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (as amended) [...]
Does section 11 (1) of the MPRDA apply to an indirect change in control?
and Mmatshepo Papo - Candidate Attorney In the recent decision of Vantage Goldfields SA (Pty) Ltd & Another v Arqomanzi [...]
Is a municipal by-law prohibiting transfer of property without a “SPLUMA Certificate” constitutional and valid?
In an unreported case[1] of the High Court of South Africa, Mpumalanga Division, Middelburg ("Court"), a number of owners [...]
(Insurance) fraud unravels all: The SCA confirms that fraud can lead to the forfeiture of a partly valid and partly fraudulent claim when a policy says so
In Discovery Insure Limited v Masindi the SCA considered whether the entirety of an insurance claim should be forfeited [...]
When do arbitration awards prescribe?
When does an arbitration award prescribe? Does an award even attract its own period of prescription? The short answer [...]