Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Employer may fairly dismiss employees for refusing to accept operational changes in the context of restructuring
Refusing to accept operational changes in the context of restructuring
Explanatory Note
Generally, the dismissal of employees to coerce them into accepting a particular employment outcome amounts to an automatically unfair dismissal within the meaning of Section 187 of LRA.
The Constitutional Court, in the matter of NUMSA and Others v Aveng Trident Steel and Another, introduced a new dimension to the dismissal of employees for refusing to accept an employer’s proposed operational changes in the context of restructuring. The Court’s central focus, in this case, was to determine the true reason for dismissal. However, this explanatory note does not deal with this aspect.
Aveng was in financial distress, and it took a decision to implement an organizational plan (which involved the restructuring of its operations), in an attempt to save its business. The restructuring entailed, amongst others, the redesigning of job descriptions. As a result, the employees were going to earn less. The arrangement was initially interim and agreed to by NUMSA. Surprisingly, when the employer sought to implement the restructured job descriptions NUMSA refused. Consequently, the employees were dismissed.
The Court, having considered that Aveng “faced harsh economic conditions and needed to restructure in order to survive and avoid the wholesale loss of jobs of its entire workforce“, determined that Aveng was justified in dismissing the employees for operational reasons. In other words, the employees were dismissed for refusing to accept the operational changes proposed by the employer (or alternatives to dismissal), and their dismissal was declared by the Court to be fair.
The Court in arriving at the decision has reminded us not to lose sight of one of the primary purposes of the LRA – to advance economic development.
Additional resources on labour law and Employment
Latest News
Land Reform – ANC To Amend Constitution
The ANC has been embroiled in an internal debate on how to operationalise the resolution it took in its 54th [...]
Labour brokers – some certainty at last
National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa v Assign Services & others By Jacques van Wyk, Director ISSUE Who is [...]
Temporary Employment Service – Judgement
On 26 July 2018, the Constitutional Court upheld the decision of the Labour Appeal Court in National Union of Metalworkers [...]
TAKE NOTE, THE COMPETITION AMENDMENT BILL, 2018
On 12 July 2018, it was announced that the Competition Amendment Bill, 2018 ("Bill") was officially introduced to the National [...]
Director, Neil Kirby comments on NHI and Medical Schemes Amendment Bill post the briefing by Health Minister, Aaron Motsoaledi
"The Minister of Health has described the advent of national health insurance or NHI as the land issue in the [...]
South Africa: A South African Perspective on Restructuring Mechanisms
Director, Eric Levenstein and Senior Associate, Lara von Wildenrath contribute to The European, Middle Eastern and African Restructuring Review 2018.This [...]
