Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Employment Equity Act compliance
There has been a recent increase in the number of employment equity audits conducted by the Department of Labour on designated employers.
The reason for this increased drive towards enforcement of a designated employer’s obligations in terms of the Employment Equity Act No.55 of 1998 (“EEA”), may be related to the recent amendments to the EEA, effected in 2014. The amended EEA makes provision for the Department of Labour to immediately approach the Labour Court for the imposition of a fine on a designated for non‑compliance with its obligation to‑
- prepare and/or implement an employment equity plan; or
- submit an annual employment equity report (EEA2).
The Department of Labour is entitled to approach the Labour Court for the imposition of a fine without giving the designated employer an opportunity to remedy its non-compliance even in the first instance of non-compliance.
The fines which the Department of Labour may request are substantial and may have devastating financial implications on a company if applied cumulatively. Alongside is a table listing the fines which may be imposed for the various non compliances.
| Previous Contravention | Contravention of any Provision of sections 16 (read with 17), 19, 22, 24, 25, 26 and 43(2) | Contravention of any Provision of sections 20, 21, 23 and 44(b) |
| No previous contravention | R1 500 000 | The greater of R1 500 000 or 2% of the employer’s turnover |
| A previous contravention in respect of the same provision | R1 800 000 | The greater of R1 800 000 or 4% of the employer’s turnover |
| A previous contravention within the previous 12 months or two previous contraventions in respect of the same provision within three years | R2 100 000 | The greater of R2 100 000 or 6% of the employer’s turnover |
| Three previous contraventions in respect of the same provision within three years | R2 400 000 | The greater of R2 400 000 or 8% of the employer’s turnover |
| Four previous contraventions in respect of the same provision within three years | R2 700 000 | The greater of R2 700 000 or 10% of the employer’s turnover |
WHAT IS A DESIGNATED EMPLOYER?
It is an employer who ‑
- employs more than 50 employees;
- employs less than 50 employees but whose annual turnover exceeds the threshold set out in the EEA (which varies depending on industry);
- is a municipality; or
- is an organ of state.
HOW DOES A DESIGNATED EMPLOYER AVOID BEING FINED?
A designated employer may avoid being fined by the Department of Labour by –
- preparing and implementing an employment equity plan;
- submitting an annual employment equity report and income differential statement;
- consulting with its duly established employment equity committee; and
- complying with other ancillary obligations such as assigning an employment equity manager and displaying the relevant information in the workplace.
OUR SERVICES
We are able to assist with ‑
- consulting with designated employers and ensuring that they understand their obligations;
- conducting employment equity audits to determine if the company is compliant with its obligations as a designated employer;
- detailed training of the employment equity committee on their role and functions;
- providing training on the recently gazetted code of good practice on the preparation and implementation of employment equity plans; and
- any other requirements for assistance with employment equity compliance.
Latest News
Does the Public Procurement Act provide for an effective dispute resolution mechanism?
by Sarah Moerane, Director and Koketso Rapoo, Senior Associate The National Treasury published the draft General Public Procurement Regulations and [...]
The shift in the evaluation criteria in South African public procurement
By Sarah Moerane, Director and Amogelang Magano, Senior Associate South Africa is in the midst of what could prove to [...]
Mind the Conduct: A Guide to COFI – Part 5: Governance and Accountability
by Hilah Laskov, Director Introduction In this article series, we take a deep dive into the South African Conduct of [...]
Misuse of the business rescue process – failure before it begins
by Dr. Eric Levenstein, Director and Head of Insolvency & Business Rescue and Amy Mackechnie, Senior Associate Business rescue was introduced [...]
Constitutional Court clarifies rights of innocent contractors under invalid state contracts
by Sarah Moerane, Director and Kuhle Joja, Associate In Minister of Defence and Military Veterans v Zeal Health Innovations (Pty) [...]
Untangling the mischief of section 43 of the Electronic Communications Act: A missed opportunity in the Amendment Bill
by Corlett Manaka, Director and Head of Disputes, Akhona Bilatyi, Director and Koketso Rapoo, Senior Associate On 12 March 2026, [...]
