Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Employment Equity Act compliance
There has been a recent increase in the number of employment equity audits conducted by the Department of Labour on designated employers.
The reason for this increased drive towards enforcement of a designated employer’s obligations in terms of the Employment Equity Act No.55 of 1998 (“EEA”), may be related to the recent amendments to the EEA, effected in 2014. The amended EEA makes provision for the Department of Labour to immediately approach the Labour Court for the imposition of a fine on a designated for non‑compliance with its obligation to‑
- prepare and/or implement an employment equity plan; or
- submit an annual employment equity report (EEA2).
The Department of Labour is entitled to approach the Labour Court for the imposition of a fine without giving the designated employer an opportunity to remedy its non-compliance even in the first instance of non-compliance.
The fines which the Department of Labour may request are substantial and may have devastating financial implications on a company if applied cumulatively. Alongside is a table listing the fines which may be imposed for the various non compliances.
Previous Contravention | Contravention of any Provision of sections 16 (read with 17), 19, 22, 24, 25, 26 and 43(2) | Contravention of any Provision of sections 20, 21, 23 and 44(b) |
No previous contravention | R1 500 000 | The greater of R1 500 000 or 2% of the employer’s turnover |
A previous contravention in respect of the same provision | R1 800 000 | The greater of R1 800 000 or 4% of the employer’s turnover |
A previous contravention within the previous 12 months or two previous contraventions in respect of the same provision within three years | R2 100 000 | The greater of R2 100 000 or 6% of the employer’s turnover |
Three previous contraventions in respect of the same provision within three years | R2 400 000 | The greater of R2 400 000 or 8% of the employer’s turnover |
Four previous contraventions in respect of the same provision within three years | R2 700 000 | The greater of R2 700 000 or 10% of the employer’s turnover |
WHAT IS A DESIGNATED EMPLOYER?
It is an employer who ‑
- employs more than 50 employees;
- employs less than 50 employees but whose annual turnover exceeds the threshold set out in the EEA (which varies depending on industry);
- is a municipality; or
- is an organ of state.
HOW DOES A DESIGNATED EMPLOYER AVOID BEING FINED?
A designated employer may avoid being fined by the Department of Labour by –
- preparing and implementing an employment equity plan;
- submitting an annual employment equity report and income differential statement;
- consulting with its duly established employment equity committee; and
- complying with other ancillary obligations such as assigning an employment equity manager and displaying the relevant information in the workplace.
OUR SERVICES
We are able to assist with ‑
- consulting with designated employers and ensuring that they understand their obligations;
- conducting employment equity audits to determine if the company is compliant with its obligations as a designated employer;
- detailed training of the employment equity committee on their role and functions;
- providing training on the recently gazetted code of good practice on the preparation and implementation of employment equity plans; and
- any other requirements for assistance with employment equity compliance.
Latest News
Pro Bono Articles
Five tips to optimise your first consultation with an attorney Coercive and Controlling Behaviour in the Domestic Violence Act [...]
FAQ – Opportunities for investors arising from the South African business rescue process
DOWNLOAD THE FAQ GUIDE HERE The South African business rescue process has created the opportunity for investors (local and [...]
Raging against the machine
and Thembelihle Tshabalala, Candidate Attorney, The meteoric rise of artificial intelligence (AI) is generating infinite possibilities and particularly so [...]
Additional obligations on accountable institutions
Following on the recent amendments to the Financial Intelligence Centre Act, 38 of 2001 ("FICA") and most notably, the [...]
The proper interpretation of conflicting provisions in the Income Tax Act
and Luke Magerman, Candidate Attorney A recent tax court judgment added valuable jurisprudence to the often-litigated issue of the interpretation [...]
What is the relevance of s 52 of the MPRDA on retrenchments in terms of section 189 and 189A in the mining industry?
In National Union of Mineworkers v Anglo American Platinum Ltd & others (Amplats), on 15 January 2013, Amplats had [...]