Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Employment of foreigners
Recently former Home Affairs Minister, Malusi Gigaba, announced that the Department of Home Affairs will move to punish employers who employ persons with illegal documents or no documents, instead of focusing on prosecution of undocumented employees. He warned businesses and companies that workplace inspections will be increased and that penalties for employing undocumented foreigners will be imposed and managers charged. In Tshwane and Johannesburg seven employers were recently arrested and charged for employing undocumented migrants after 567 business premises were inspected by the Department of Home Affairs.
The Immigration Act 13 of 2002 (as amended) (“the Immigration Act”) requires that any foreigner (a person who is not a citizen of South Africa) must be in possession of a work permit entitling the person to work in South Africa, before such person can validly perform any work in South Africa. It is an offence in terms of the Immigration Act for an employer to employ a foreigner whose status does not allow the foreigner to perform work in South Africa.
In this regard section 49(3) of the Immigration Act provides that anyone who knowingly employs an illegal foreigner or a foreigner in violation of the provisions of the Immigration Act shall be guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to a fine or to imprisonment not exceeding one year, provided that such person’s second conviction of such an offence shall be punishable by imprisonment not exceeding two years or a fine, and the third or subsequent convictions of such offences by imprisonment not exceeding three years without the option of a fine.
Sources:
“Clampdown of employers hiring undocumented migrants”, The Citizen, 6 March 2017; “‘We are coming for you’ – Gigaba to businesses employing illegal immigrants”, news24, 23 February 2017.
Should you require any information regarding the above please do not hesitate to contact us.
If you would like to learn more about Labour & Employment please visit our practice area page.
Latest News
The right to a fair hearing trumps the contract of employment
By: Jacques van Wyk, Director and Andre Van Heerden, Senior Associate and Yusha Davidson, Candidate Attorney ISSUE Can an employee be [...]
Automatically unfair dismissals versus legitimate dismissals for operational requirements: the importance of the ‘true reasons’ for the dismissal
By: Jacques van Wyk, Director, Andre van Heerden, Senior Associate and, Unathi Jukuda, Candidate Attorney ISSUE Whether, in dismissing employees, the [...]
Corroborative evidence is required to establish intoxication
By: Jacques van Wyk, Director, Andre van Heerden, Senior Associate and, Unathi Jukuda, Candidate Attorney ISSUE Whether an employer can dismiss [...]
Is an employee able to avoid a disciplinary hearing or disciplinary sanction by resigning?
It is trite law that employees may resign from his employment, either with immediate effect or on notice, thereby unilaterally [...]
Paternity leave
By Jacques van Wyk, Director and Yusha Davidson, Candidate Attorney The Basic Conditions of Employment Act 75 of 1997 ("BCEA") [...]
Struggle songs in the workplace
By Jacques van Wyk, Director and Yusha Davidson, Candidate Attorney ISSUE Is the singing of struggle songs in the workplace [...]
