Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Enforcement notice issued to Dis-Chem due to contravention of POPIA
and Chiara Ferri, Candidate Attorney
The importance of compliance has once again been highlighted as the Information Regulator issued an Enforcement Notice to Dis-Chem Pharmacies Ltd (“Dis-Chem“) on 1 September 2023 for non-compliance with the Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 (“POPIA“).
The Information Regulator is casting their net wide when it’s come to investigating contraventions, whether it be against large, small, private or public companies and is cracking down on ensuring consumers’ information is safeguarded and lawfully processed.
The Information Regulator found that Dis-Chem failed to identify the risk of using weak passwords, failed to implement measures to monitor and detect unlawful access to their environment and that they hadn’t entered into any operator agreement with their third party service provider which would have, amongst other things outlined the process of reporting to Dis-Chem in the event of a security compromise.
The Information Regulator has ordered Dis-Chem to conduct a Personal Information Impact Assessment and to ensure that adequate measures and standards exist to comply with the conditions for the lawful processing of personal information. They have also been mandated to implement an adequate Incident Response Plan, involving strong access control measures, maintaining a vulnerability management programme, implementing strong access control measures and maintaining an Information Security Policy.
Dis-chem have been ordered to conclude written contracts with all operators who process personal information on its behalf and to develop, implement, monitor and maintain a compliance framework. Failure to comply with such obligations will result in an administrative fine or result in a conviction of imprisonment or both.
A breach of this nature, and the finding as to the lack of safeguards in place should come as a shock for an organisation of this size and an organisation which holds such a vast quantity of data. One would expect that all prominent companies in South Africa would have conducted an impact assessment and would give credence to their responsibilities in protecting their customers’ data. The Information Regulators guidance to Information Officers is clear. Understanding the privacy landscape together with rights, obligations and duties are not negotiable. A robust privacy programme empowers companies to demonstrate that they reasonably comply with the obligations as stipulate in POPIA.
The Werksmans regulatory team has developed electronic tools and a sound methodology which aim to assist with impact assessments and the implementation of a compliance road-map. Compliance with POPIA is not a template that is downloaded and copied. A clear understanding of the legislation is paramount.
Click below to access Ahmore Burger-Smidt’s latest publication:

Latest News
BBBEE Commission Makes Finding Against The MTN Zakhele Futhi Scheme
By Pieter Steyn, Director The Broad‑Based Black Economic Empowerment (BBBEE) Commission has published its findings and recommendations following its investigation [...]
The Case Of Non-traditional Trade Marks – Can The Soles Of Shoes Be Protected As Trade Marks?
By Janine Hollesen, Head of Intellectual Property Practice The answer to this question is yes according to the KwaZulu-Natal High [...]
Werksmans Women Winners
The WOZA awards are presented annually to women lawyers in recognition of their outstanding dedication, achievements and contribution to the [...]
When Kimono Became Kimohno! – Don’t Be Caught Off Guard When Choosing Your Trade Mark
By Janine Hollesen, Director Recently the reality star, Kim Kardashian, was caught in the cross-hairs of a trade mark storm [...]
Amendments To China’s Trade Mark Laws
By Donvay Wegierski, Director In April 2019 it was announced that certain Amendments to China's Trade Mark law will come [...]
European Union: Adidas Ruling
By Donvay Wegierski, Director The General court of the European Union recently upheld a 2016 ruling by the EU regulator [...]
