Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Enforcement notice issued to Dis-Chem due to contravention of POPIA
and Chiara Ferri, Candidate Attorney
The importance of compliance has once again been highlighted as the Information Regulator issued an Enforcement Notice to Dis-Chem Pharmacies Ltd (“Dis-Chem“) on 1 September 2023 for non-compliance with the Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 (“POPIA“).
The Information Regulator is casting their net wide when it’s come to investigating contraventions, whether it be against large, small, private or public companies and is cracking down on ensuring consumers’ information is safeguarded and lawfully processed.
The Information Regulator found that Dis-Chem failed to identify the risk of using weak passwords, failed to implement measures to monitor and detect unlawful access to their environment and that they hadn’t entered into any operator agreement with their third party service provider which would have, amongst other things outlined the process of reporting to Dis-Chem in the event of a security compromise.
The Information Regulator has ordered Dis-Chem to conduct a Personal Information Impact Assessment and to ensure that adequate measures and standards exist to comply with the conditions for the lawful processing of personal information. They have also been mandated to implement an adequate Incident Response Plan, involving strong access control measures, maintaining a vulnerability management programme, implementing strong access control measures and maintaining an Information Security Policy.
Dis-chem have been ordered to conclude written contracts with all operators who process personal information on its behalf and to develop, implement, monitor and maintain a compliance framework. Failure to comply with such obligations will result in an administrative fine or result in a conviction of imprisonment or both.
A breach of this nature, and the finding as to the lack of safeguards in place should come as a shock for an organisation of this size and an organisation which holds such a vast quantity of data. One would expect that all prominent companies in South Africa would have conducted an impact assessment and would give credence to their responsibilities in protecting their customers’ data. The Information Regulators guidance to Information Officers is clear. Understanding the privacy landscape together with rights, obligations and duties are not negotiable. A robust privacy programme empowers companies to demonstrate that they reasonably comply with the obligations as stipulate in POPIA.
The Werksmans regulatory team has developed electronic tools and a sound methodology which aim to assist with impact assessments and the implementation of a compliance road-map. Compliance with POPIA is not a template that is downloaded and copied. A clear understanding of the legislation is paramount.
Click below to access Ahmore Burger-Smidt’s latest publication:

Latest News
Far reaching judgment of the recent silicosis class action case
INTRODUCTION The scope and magnitude of the proposed class actions envisaged in Nkala v Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited (Treatment [...]
What happens to confidential information exchanged between the Competition Commission and sector regulators as the number of co-operation
The protection of confidential information has always been a feather in the cap of the Competition Commission (“Commission”). The Competition [...]
Special voluntary disclosure and exchange control relief
By: The Werksmans Tax Team INTRODUCTION Following the announcement of the Special Voluntary Disclosure Programme (SVDP) in [...]
Is the alleged transfer of an insolvent business indeed a transfer as a going concern
Mokhele & Others v Schmidt & Others (JS 564/11) 19 May 2016 ISSUE Whether the alleged transfer of an [...]
Can a strike be rendered unlawful as a result of unlawful acts including acts of violence?
National Union of Food Beverage Wine Spirits and Allied Workers (NUFBWSAW) and others v Universal Product Network (Pty) Ltd In [...]
Is a collective agreement valid and binding, despite a dispute as to the authority of those purporting to conclude the agreement?
South African Airways (Soc) Ltd & another v National Transport Movement & others (Case no: J1872/2015, 12 May 2016) [...]
