Legal updates and opinions
News / News
European Union: Adidas Ruling
By Donvay Wegierski, Director
The General court of the European Union recently upheld a 2016 ruling by the EU regulator thereby cancelling Adidas EU trade mark registration comprising three stripes depicted as:
This trade mark was filed in 2014 and the registration thereof challenged by Belgian company, Shoe Branding Europe. The General court ruled that this trade mark lacked distinctive character and is instead an ordinary figurative mark. The court found that the evidence adduced did not sufficiently show that the consumer, on seeing this three stripe mark applied to clothing, footwear and headgear in the EU would associate the mark with Adidas.
This judgement demonstrates the firm stance adopted by the EU when assessing distinctiveness. Since a trade mark grants the proprietor exclusivity to a mark in relation to the goods and services for which it is registered – in this instance clothing, footwear and headgear in class 25 – the distinctiveness requirement is absolute. The manner in which the trade mark was registered requires particular consideration being three black vertical stripes. Although the court did not find in favour of Adidas in this instance, the ruling may have no effect on the broad scope of protection that Adidas already has on its well-known three stripes registered in various forms in Europe and elsewhere.
If you would like to learn more about Intellectual Property please visit our practice area page.
Latest News
The importance of a complete record of the arbitration proceedings
Lessons from Minister of Police v Police and Prisons Civil Rights Union (POPCRU) Obo Senti and Others (PA15/2021) [2023] ZALAC [...]
The Electricity Regulation Amendment Bill: A New Era for the Energy Sector?
The Electricity Regulation Amendment Bill [B 23 - 2023] (the Bill), has been published for comment and aims to introduce [...]
Pre-owned purchases and the Consumer Protection Act
and Sabine Letellier, Candidate Attorney Purchasing a pre-owned vehicle may deprive a consumer of that new car smell, but it [...]
Proving claims in an insolvent estate – basic principles reaffirmed
In the recent case of Firstrand Bank Limited v the Master of the High Court and others handed down on [...]
Should Post-Commencement Financiers have a vote on Business Rescue Plans?
Reviewed by, Dr Eric Levenstein, Director and Head of Business Rescue & Insolvency A critical look at Wescoal Mining (Pty) [...]
The in duplum rule: some insights
and Lwazi-Lwandile Simelane, Candidate Attorney Interest stops running when the unpaid interest equals the amount of the outstanding capital claim. [...]