Legal updates and opinions
News / News
European Union: Adidas Ruling
By Donvay Wegierski, Director
The General court of the European Union recently upheld a 2016 ruling by the EU regulator thereby cancelling Adidas EU trade mark registration comprising three stripes depicted as:
This trade mark was filed in 2014 and the registration thereof challenged by Belgian company, Shoe Branding Europe. The General court ruled that this trade mark lacked distinctive character and is instead an ordinary figurative mark. The court found that the evidence adduced did not sufficiently show that the consumer, on seeing this three stripe mark applied to clothing, footwear and headgear in the EU would associate the mark with Adidas.
This judgement demonstrates the firm stance adopted by the EU when assessing distinctiveness. Since a trade mark grants the proprietor exclusivity to a mark in relation to the goods and services for which it is registered – in this instance clothing, footwear and headgear in class 25 – the distinctiveness requirement is absolute. The manner in which the trade mark was registered requires particular consideration being three black vertical stripes. Although the court did not find in favour of Adidas in this instance, the ruling may have no effect on the broad scope of protection that Adidas already has on its well-known three stripes registered in various forms in Europe and elsewhere.
If you would like to learn more about Intellectual Property please visit our practice area page.
Latest News
Is an agreement referring to unannexed annexures void for vagueness?
The courts have held that at times when agreements are being interpreted, the proper meaning of words may initially appear [...]
Private equity exits: Will the new Competition Commission merger guidelines stifle or encourage investment appetite?
Reviewed by Dominique Arteiro, from a Competition Law perspective, Director. In any private equity investment life cycle, the exit environment [...]
Sub- contract agreements vs the letting of mining rights
It is the ordinary course of business for South African mining right holders ("MRH") to contract with third party service [...]
Parenting is a job for two: The High Court declares the provisions relating to parental leave unconstitutional
and Anna Tchalov, Candidate Attorney In the matter of Van Wyk and Others v The Minister of Employment and Labour [...]
Religious freedom and operational requirements: which one should prevail?
and Nombulelo Bashe, Candidate Attorney Culture is the sum total of the beliefs and traditions of a particular society and [...]
Consequences of employees misrepresenting their qualifications and professional memberships
and Tasreeq Ferreira and Nombulelo Bashe, Candidate Attorneys Issue Whether an employee may be dismissed if he/she misrepresented his/her qualifications [...]
