Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Explanatory Note
“No right, including the right to strike, is absolute.”
(AMCU and Others vs Anglo Gold Ashanti and Others)
The right to strike is understood and accepted to be a principal weapon employees use in the struggle to improve their livelihood and to overcome centuries of discrimination. This right is entrenched in the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa (the Constitution) and therefore cannot be interfered with lightly. However, the right to strike is not absolute and like all other rights, is subject to a limitation.
It is trite that the right to strike is limited by both the Constitution and the LRA. According to section 213 of the LRA, a strike is defined as “partial or complete concerted refusal to work, or the retardation or obstruction of work”. The Constitutional Court has expressed a view that the definition implies that all strikes must be peaceful.
Section 17 of the Constitution reinforces the limitation as it guarantees that “everyone has the right, peacefully and unarmed, to assemble, to demonstrate, to picket, and to present petitions”.
Having considered the limitations imposed by both the Constitution and the LRA, the Constitutional Court, albeit in passing, determined that “once strikes cease to be peaceful, they lose the protection of the law”. Because the Constitutional Court is an apex court its obiter dictum carries weight and has a binding effect on the courts below it. Although the obiter dictum was in the context of the secondary strike, we see no reason why a primary strike cannot be interdicted on the same basis.
In light of the obiter dictum, in this case, we are of the view that employers are not limited to interdicting the violence during a strike but can also interdict the strike itself on the basis that it has turned violent.
It remains to be seen whether the historical and/or potential violence will be a factor that a court will consider in interdicting a primary strike.
Latest News
Employment Equity Amendment Act Commencement – Important news for employers employing more than 50 employees
The President of the Republic of South Africa has recently proclaimed that the Employment Equity Amendment Act No.4 of 2022 [...]
Shell shock: reversal of landmark Dutch ruling holds lessons for South African climate change litigation
- Reviewer and Slade van Rooyen - Candidate Attorney The 2021 decision of a Dutch district court in Milieudefensie v [...]
A step closer to establishing the National Council on gender-based violence and femicide
After the President assented to the National Council on Gender-Based Violence and Femicide Act No. 9 of 2024 ("Act") in [...]
The Climate Change Act has a crucial role to play in the fight against the climate crisis in South Africa
and Mmatshepo Papo - Candidate Attorney Frequent and intense weather events and devastating effects of climate change are being experienced [...]
Stretching Boundaries: Can a Trade Union Represent Employees Who Fall Outside of its Registered Scope in Employment Disputes?
and Yendiswa Sithole - Candidate Attorney The Constitutional Court ("the CC") in AFGRI Animal Feeds (A Division of PhilAfrica Foods [...]
Working From Home: Can Employers Withhold Pay Over Office Attendance?
and Hanán Jeppie - Candidate Attorney ISSUE In National Union of Public Service and Allied Workers obo Cesiko / South [...]