Legal updates and opinions
News / News
GDPR and domain names
By Janine Hollesen and Donvay Wegierski, Directors
On 25 May 2018 the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) came into effect which is applicable to anyone selling goods or providing services to those within the EU. Non-compliance with the GDPR could result in a fine of up to 4% of the company’s global revenues.
The implementation of the GDPR also affects domain names. Access to registrant particulars (on whois registries) have always been disclosed but now whois information is limited to registrar, dates of registration and name server information.
The concern is that the GDPR may have the accidental effect of protecting cyber squatters as tracing the registrant of an unauthorised domain name becomes more onerous, requiring assistance from domain name registries as opposed to finding the information previously available online. Domain name registration at the outset may prove to be the simplest defence. Trade mark registration also means that trade mark owners have priority when new top level domains are launched.
Trade mark owners should therefore ensure that their intellectual property strategy extends to the registration of the trade marks, company names and brands as domain names in relation to all top-level domain names of relevance.
Latest News
SABS publishes draft AI standards for public comment
by Wendy Rosenberg, Director and Head of Digital Media & Electronic Communications The South African Bureau of Standards (SABS) has [...]
Too old for the package? Labour Court draws the line on age-based severance
by Bradley Workman-Davies, Director The Labour Court’s decision in Bosch v Passenger Rail Agency of SA provides employers with a [...]
Proposed Amendments to the Mandatory Mediation Protocol in the Gauteng Division of the High Court: Will the latest attempt to redirect judicial traffic succeed?
by Dakalo Singo, Director and Head of Pro Bono, and Wamkelwe Ntuli, Candidate Attorney Introduction The Gauteng Division of the [...]
Section 11 consent: Can the regulator breathe life into a void transaction?
by Kathleen Louw, Director 1. Section 11 of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act 28 of 2002 ("the MPRDA") [...]
Resign First, Complain Later? The LAC Draws the Line on Constructive Dismissal
by Bradley Workman-Davies, Director Constructive dismissal is not an escape route for employees who are dissatisfied with their working environment, [...]
Kusile Pollution: SCA Orders Eskom and Regulators to Act
by Jones Antunes, Director (Reviewer), and Tashlin Ramanundh, Candidate Attorney Environmental authorisations impose strict obligations which continue throughout the life [...]
