Legal updates and opinions
News / News
GDPR and domain names
By Janine Hollesen and Donvay Wegierski, Directors
On 25 May 2018 the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) came into effect which is applicable to anyone selling goods or providing services to those within the EU. Non-compliance with the GDPR could result in a fine of up to 4% of the company’s global revenues.
The implementation of the GDPR also affects domain names. Access to registrant particulars (on whois registries) have always been disclosed but now whois information is limited to registrar, dates of registration and name server information.
The concern is that the GDPR may have the accidental effect of protecting cyber squatters as tracing the registrant of an unauthorised domain name becomes more onerous, requiring assistance from domain name registries as opposed to finding the information previously available online. Domain name registration at the outset may prove to be the simplest defence. Trade mark registration also means that trade mark owners have priority when new top level domains are launched.
Trade mark owners should therefore ensure that their intellectual property strategy extends to the registration of the trade marks, company names and brands as domain names in relation to all top-level domain names of relevance.
Latest News
Data protection impact assessment required despite “Might of the State”
Kenyan High Court Introduction On 14 October 2021, the Kenyan High Court declared the collection of biometric information and the [...]
Your Actions in Cyberspace can Land You in Prison!
Cybercrimes Act, 19 of 2020 By proclamation in the Gazette, President Cyril Ramaphosa has fixed 1 December 2021 as the date [...]
Data protection and privacy regulation: A roundup of developments in Africa in 2021
Data protection, cybercrimes and/or cybersecurity laws The increase in internet penetration in Africa has made it easier to collect, use [...]
Who was worse: The Attorney or the Legal Practice Council?
Roll of attorneys In a matter recently heard before the Western Cape High Court, erstwhile attorney Gerrit Smit Van Wyk [...]
Shareholders stuck between a rock and a hard place
Companies Act 71 of 2008 Brief overview of Section 163 Introduction There are instances where the Companies Act 71 of [...]
Who appoints the substitute BRP? A look into the meaning of Section 139(3) of the Companies Act
Section 139(3) of the Companies Act Who has the power to appoint a business rescue practitioner's replacement, in circumstances where [...]
