Legal updates and opinions
News / News
GDPR and domain names
By Janine Hollesen and Donvay Wegierski, Directors
On 25 May 2018 the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) came into effect which is applicable to anyone selling goods or providing services to those within the EU. Non-compliance with the GDPR could result in a fine of up to 4% of the company’s global revenues.
The implementation of the GDPR also affects domain names. Access to registrant particulars (on whois registries) have always been disclosed but now whois information is limited to registrar, dates of registration and name server information.
The concern is that the GDPR may have the accidental effect of protecting cyber squatters as tracing the registrant of an unauthorised domain name becomes more onerous, requiring assistance from domain name registries as opposed to finding the information previously available online. Domain name registration at the outset may prove to be the simplest defence. Trade mark registration also means that trade mark owners have priority when new top level domains are launched.
Trade mark owners should therefore ensure that their intellectual property strategy extends to the registration of the trade marks, company names and brands as domain names in relation to all top-level domain names of relevance.
Latest News
The definition of “worker” in the national minimum wage bill
By: Jacques van Wyk, Director and Andre Van Heerden, Senior Associate and Yusha Davidson, Candidate Attorney The Department of Labour has [...]
Regulations on national minimum wage exemptions
By: Jacques van Wyk, Director and Andre Van Heerden, Senior Associate and Yusha Davidson, Candidate Attorney The National Minimum Wage Bill [...]
The right to a fair hearing trumps the contract of employment
By: Jacques van Wyk, Director and Andre Van Heerden, Senior Associate and Yusha Davidson, Candidate Attorney ISSUE Can an employee be [...]
Automatically unfair dismissals versus legitimate dismissals for operational requirements: the importance of the ‘true reasons’ for the dismissal
By: Jacques van Wyk, Director, Andre van Heerden, Senior Associate and, Unathi Jukuda, Candidate Attorney ISSUE Whether, in dismissing employees, the [...]
Corroborative evidence is required to establish intoxication
By: Jacques van Wyk, Director, Andre van Heerden, Senior Associate and, Unathi Jukuda, Candidate Attorney ISSUE Whether an employer can dismiss [...]
The admissibility of evidence related to discussions held during a conciliation hearing
By Jacques van Wyk, Director and Yusha Davidson, Candidate Attorney ISSUE Can the Labour Court receive and rely on evidence [...]
