Legal updates and opinions
News / News
GDPR and domain names
By Janine Hollesen and Donvay Wegierski, Directors
On 25 May 2018 the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) came into effect which is applicable to anyone selling goods or providing services to those within the EU. Non-compliance with the GDPR could result in a fine of up to 4% of the company’s global revenues.
The implementation of the GDPR also affects domain names. Access to registrant particulars (on whois registries) have always been disclosed but now whois information is limited to registrar, dates of registration and name server information.
The concern is that the GDPR may have the accidental effect of protecting cyber squatters as tracing the registrant of an unauthorised domain name becomes more onerous, requiring assistance from domain name registries as opposed to finding the information previously available online. Domain name registration at the outset may prove to be the simplest defence. Trade mark registration also means that trade mark owners have priority when new top level domains are launched.
Trade mark owners should therefore ensure that their intellectual property strategy extends to the registration of the trade marks, company names and brands as domain names in relation to all top-level domain names of relevance.
Latest News
Pro Bono Articles
Five tips to optimise your first consultation with an attorney Coercive and Controlling Behaviour in the Domestic Violence Act [...]
FAQ – Opportunities for investors arising from the South African business rescue process
DOWNLOAD THE FAQ GUIDE HERE The South African business rescue process has created the opportunity for investors (local and [...]
Raging against the machine
and Thembelihle Tshabalala, Candidate Attorney, The meteoric rise of artificial intelligence (AI) is generating infinite possibilities and particularly so [...]
Additional obligations on accountable institutions
Following on the recent amendments to the Financial Intelligence Centre Act, 38 of 2001 ("FICA") and most notably, the [...]
The proper interpretation of conflicting provisions in the Income Tax Act
and Luke Magerman, Candidate Attorney A recent tax court judgment added valuable jurisprudence to the often-litigated issue of the interpretation [...]
What is the relevance of s 52 of the MPRDA on retrenchments in terms of section 189 and 189A in the mining industry?
In National Union of Mineworkers v Anglo American Platinum Ltd & others (Amplats), on 15 January 2013, Amplats had [...]