Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Gucci is well-known in singapore
By: Donvay Wegiersk, Director
A mark is considered well-known if a larger portion of the public can immediately recognise the mark with the goods and services to which it relates.
In finding that the GUCCI mark is well-known in Singapore, the Singapore trade mark office held that all that needs to be shown is a real or serious probability of damage to the well-known mark’s advertising quality or symbolic function without the need of survey evidence. As survey evidence can be laborious and extremely expensive this approach is likely to be welcomed by owners of luxury and other well-known brands that may be regarded as well-known.
This view would be welcomed by South African trade mark practitioners in light of the expensive and time consuming task in conducting surveys which are usually subject to scrutiny by the opposing party which could be struck out by the courts if not conducted properly.
Latest News
Woolworths Vs Ubuntu Baba Saga
2019 certainly started with a bang for Woolworths when social media carried the story of its sale of a baby [...]
Cutting edge issues for south african boards of directors facing financial distress in 2019
INTRODUCTION Over the years, South African directors have, from time to time been faced with claims of malfeasance, reckless trading, [...]
African competition law developments in 2018 and the outlook for 2019
Africa is sometimes described as the "last frontier" of competition law. This observation arises because many African countries have only [...]
Brexit And Trade Marks – What Is Next
The following considerations and time frames concerning trade marks in the UK are expected to apply to European Trade Marks [...]
‘Deal’ or ‘No Deal’ – brexit and trade marks
By Donvay Wegierski, Director Depending on the circumstances, the following considerations and time frames concerning trade marks in the UK [...]
South Africa: primark cancelled due to non-use
By Janine Hollesen, Director Truworths brought a cancellation application against Primark Holdings’ registration for PRIMARK on the basis that the [...]
