Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Gucci is well-known in singapore
By: Donvay Wegiersk, Director
A mark is considered well-known if a larger portion of the public can immediately recognise the mark with the goods and services to which it relates.
In finding that the GUCCI mark is well-known in Singapore, the Singapore trade mark office held that all that needs to be shown is a real or serious probability of damage to the well-known mark’s advertising quality or symbolic function without the need of survey evidence. As survey evidence can be laborious and extremely expensive this approach is likely to be welcomed by owners of luxury and other well-known brands that may be regarded as well-known.
This view would be welcomed by South African trade mark practitioners in light of the expensive and time consuming task in conducting surveys which are usually subject to scrutiny by the opposing party which could be struck out by the courts if not conducted properly.
Latest News
To credit is to pay
Although common in practice, and especially between group companies, not much judicial thought has previously been given to the tax [...]
Domestic violence: a sad South African reality
The plight of violence against women in our country has been given much media attention in recent times, especially during [...]
Top ten reasons to register your trade marks
The significance of registering trade marks should never be underestimated by any business with countless reasons as to why you [...]
Understatement penalties: what is a bona fide inadvertent error?
INTRODUCTION The Tax Administration Act No 28 of 2011 (TAA) introduced the understatement penalty regime with effect from 1 [...]
The LAC rules on the TES deeming provision
THE CLIENT BECOMES THE SOLE EMPLOYER WHEN THE DEEMING PROVISION KICKS IN INTRODUCTION In NUMSA v Assign Services [...]
The validity of automatic termination clauses in contracts of employment
ISSUE(S) Whether the employee was unfairly dismissed after his appointment letter was automatically terminated because of a provision stating [...]
