Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Heritage Matters: Celebrating Heritage Month 2023
In this Heritage Month, as we celebrate the richness of Traditional Knowledge (TK) and Traditional Cultural Expressions (TCEs), we also recognise the ongoing efforts to protect, promote and preserve them for generations to come and the role that intellectual property systems and principles can play:
- in protecting TK and TCEs from being misappropriated; and
- in the commercialisation thereof with equitable benefit-sharing for all parties.
What is Traditional Knowledge? While there is no specific definition for TK, it is a living body of knowledge which has been developed, sustained and passed on from generation to generation within a community, examples of which are agricultural, environmental or medicinal knowledge, including knowledge regarding traditional medicines.
During the month of September, we will focus on Traditional Cultural Expressions (TCEs) which are understood to be the forms in which the traditional culture is expressed including stories, riddles, musical expressions (such as songs and instrumental music), drawings, paintings, carvings, jewellery, textiles and dancing. Developed and preserved by indigenous communities, TCEs are characteristic of the cultural essence of these communities.
The very nature of TCEs present challenges when attempting to harmonise them with conventional intellectual property (“IP”) frameworks. In the area of copyright law, for example, the first owner is usually the author or creator of the work. As an inherent aspect of TCEs is their inter generational transmission within indigenous communities, the conundrum which is created is that TCEs are owned collectively by the community rather than by an individual identifiable author. A further challenge is the time-based protection in conventional IP regimes.
In South Africa, although not yet in force, the following two pieces of legislation have been passed which contemplates protection and commercialisation for TK –
- The Intellectual Property Laws Amendment Act 2013 (IPLAA); and
- The Protection, Promotion, Development and Management of Indigenous Knowledge Systems Act 2019 (IKSA).
The legislation adopts different approaches in the protection of TK – while IPLAA aims to protect TK by amending existing IP legislation, IKSA seeks to provide sui generis or special protection, treating TK as deserving of protection in its own right, rather than fitting it into the conventional IP regimes. Calls have been made for the IPLAA to be repealed and to rather provide for special protection. We will provide updates in this regard as they occur.
The issue of how best to preserve the cultural heritage of indigenous communities is not unique to South Africa. Various countries and organisations across the world continue to grapple with this issue. What is clear is that the protection of TCEs defies a one-size-fits-all and that a balance is to be achieved.
Look out for our next #HeritageMatters post in celebration of Heritage month.
Latest News
Update: Temporary Employer / Employee Relief Scheme (“TERS”): The May application process
by Jacques van Wyk, Director; Andre van Heerden, Senior Associate; and Thabisa Yantolo, Candidate Attorney On 28 May 2020 the [...]
Is my business insured?
by Walid Brown, Director and Elzaan Haynes, Candidate Attorney We all take out insurance to cover everything from our homes [...]
Royal IP continued
by Donvay Wegierski, Director We have previously written about Prince Harry and Meghan Markle stepping down as "senior royals". The [...]
COVID-19 and online precautions for brand owners
by Donvay Wegierski, Director As the world heeds the call to stay at home and flatten the curve our online [...]
Specifications and bad faith – The CJEU Skykick ruling
by Donvay Wegierski, Director As trade marks are classified in classes according to the relevant goods and/or services, trade mark [...]
Discovery vs Liberty – When is use of a trade mark an infringement?
by Janine Hollesen, Director Various Discovery companies took Liberty Group Limited ("Liberty") to court over Liberty's use of Discovery's VITALITY [...]
