Legal updates and opinions
News / News
How SIM cards and open Wi-Fi allegedly exposed the SANDF’s data weaknesses
The South African National Defence Force (“SANDF“) plays a critical role in safeguarding South Africa’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.[1] As the backbone of South Africa’s defence infrastructure, the SANDF processes vast amounts of personal information, but also classified information essential to its operations, intelligence and planning.
Given this crucial function, the SANDF is expected to maintain the highest level of security when it comes to protecting its data systems. However, there have been recent allegations that its data systems were “compromised” by an installer’s SIM cards and open access Wi-Fi.[2]
It was reported that –[3]
- the computer management system that backs up all the military’s internal databases had been compromised after a contractor installed SIM cards and open access via Wi-Fi on the nationwide relay systems; and
- defence intelligence raided the relay stations to remove the microchips and SIM cards.
Whether or not an actual “compromise” occurred, this incident underscores the importance of implementing robust security safeguards as required in terms of the Protection of Personal Information 4 of 2013 (“POPIA“). In particular, section 19 of POPIA specifically requires responsible parties (in this instance, the SANDF) to take “appropriate, reasonable technical and organisational measures” to prevent –
- loss of, damage to or unauthorised destruction of personal information; and
- unlawful access to or processing of personal information.
In this instance, the allegation that the SANDF’s national data systems were compromised by an installer’s SIM cards and open access Wi-Fi suggests a weakness in the security framework of the SANDF and potentially exposes the SANDF to data breaches, unauthorised monitoring and/or even espionage which could have far-reaching consequences for national security.
Consequently, implementing appropriate security safeguards as required by POPIA such as, amongst others, encrypted communication channels and restricted access to networks is critical to protect and ensure the security of personal information. This alleged “compromise” demonstrates the urgent need for organisations, particularly those processing special personal information or those in high-security environments (like the SANDF) to proactively assess and enhance their security safeguards and data protection policies and procedures. Failing to comply presents risk from a POPIA perspective, but also (in this instance) puts national security at risk.
“There are only two types of companies: those that have been hacked and those that will be.“
Robert S. Mueller, Former FBI Director
The Werksmans Data Privacy and Cyber teams aim to empower clients in establishing robust security architecture and posture. In particular, we conduct data protection impact assessments as required in terms of POPIA in order to reveal weaknesses in security safeguards.
[1] See the website of the Department of Defence at http://www.dod.mil.za/about, accessed on 11 October 2024.
[2] See the City Press article titled “SANDF national data systems ‘compromised’ by installer’s SIM cards and open access Wi-Fi” available at https://www.news24.com/citypress/news/sandf-national-data-systems-compromised-by-installers-sim-cards-and-open-access-wi-fi-20240915, accessed on 11 October 2024.
[3] See the City Press article titled “SANDF national data systems ‘compromised’ by installer’s SIM cards and open access Wi-Fi” available at https://www.news24.com/citypress/news/sandf-national-data-systems-compromised-by-installers-sim-cards-and-open-access-wi-fi-20240915, accessed on 11 October 2024.
Latest News
Procedural certainty in business rescue: Competing commencement processes
by Eric Levenstein, Director and Head of Insolvency & Business Rescue, Brandon Starr, Senior Associate and Clio Patricios, Candidate Attorney [...]
When silence becomes complicity: Constructive dismissal, workplace bullying and the cost of doing nothing
by Bradley Workman-Davies, Director Constructive dismissal remains one of the more difficult claims to prove in South African labour law. [...]
Nxele v Chairperson of the Disciplinary Hearing: Mudau NO and others, [2026] 6 BLLR 628 (LC): Clarifying the operation of section 188A(11) of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995
by Bankey Sono, Director and Sandile Mogweng, Candidate Attorney The Labour Court in Nxele v Chairperson of the Disciplinary Hearing: [...]
No grout about it: The LAC cements section 197 principles
by Bradley Workman-Davies, Director Section 197 of the Labour Relations Act has long been one of the most misunderstood and [...]
Making sense of death: A brief overview of inquest proceedings
by Dakalo Singo, Director and Head of Pro Bono By its very nature, death is tragic. The death of a [...]
Is cryptocurrency ‘capital’? Taking the Mangundhla judgment under the loop
by Deon Griessel, Director 1. Introduction Two Gauteng Division judgements have reached diametrically opposite conclusions on the question as to [...]
