Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Incitement to strike
Inciting employees to commit misconduct
When does the conduct of an employee amount to ‘incitement’ justifying disciplinary action?
In order to discipline an employee for inciting employees to commit misconduct, of any form, an employer must be able to show that the employee in question sought to reach and influence the minds of other employees in order to commit a crime or misconduct. In the context of a strike, a shop steward who calls a meeting with a group of non-striking employees in order to query whether they will join the remaining employees in their unlawful strike action cannot be said to have gone far enough to justify dismissal on the basis of incitement.
Engaging in the unlawful strike
In Albion Services CC v CCMA and others (D 275/10) [2013] ZALCD 12 (12 May 2013) the employer’s workforce had divided into two groups, the first group (“group A”) had engaged in an unlawful strike action while the second group (“group B”) had elected to continue working.
Upon engaging in the unlawful strike, management warned the strikers of the unlawfulness of their actions. Subsequent to such warning, a shop steward for a trade union held a meeting with group B. During the meeting the shop steward asked what group B’s intentions were when group A continued with their strike. As a result of his action, the shop steward was charged with incitement to strike and insolence. He was dismissed after an internal disciplinary hearing after being found guilty of the first charge. At arbitration, his dismissal was found to be unfair as the employer had failed to prove incitement.
Upon review, the Labour Court confirmed the finding of the arbitrator finding that there was no evidence suggesting the shop steward did more than merely trying to ascertain the view of the non-striking employees. In order for conduct to constitute incitement, an employee must act in such a manner so that he ‘reached and sought to influence the minds’ of his fellow employees. Calling a meeting merely presented an opportunity to incite which the employee did not exploit.
An employee can be guilty of inciting other employees
An employee can be guilty of inciting other employees to commit misconduct such as participating in an unlawful strike. However, the employer must prove that the employee ‘reached and sought to influence the minds’ of his fellow employees to commit such misconduct. Whether an employee has done so will have to be determined based on the facts of the matter. Merely asking whether employees intended to join an unlawful strike would not be enough. There will clearly have to be an element of persuasion or cajoling on the part of the employee.
Latest News
Recent Competition Tribunal Case clarifies approach to ownership conditions in South African merger approvals
by Pieter Steyn, Director In a recent case, the Competition Tribunal clarified its approach regarding the imposition of conditions for [...]
Proposed New Capital Flow Management Regulations fail to live up to expectations
by Kyle Fyfe, Director On 17 April 2026, National Treasury and the South African Reserve Bank published the long awaited [...]
Understanding the 1 May 2026 BCEA Earnings Threshold Adjustment: Implications for employers and employees
by Banky Sono, Director, Dakalo Singo, Head of Pro Bono, Neo Sewela, Director and Sandile Mogweng, Candidate Attorney The Minister [...]
The Banks Win on Appeal: SCA Overturns R704 Million High Court Judgment
by Tshegofatso Matlou, Associate, reviewed by Jones Antunes, Director In the decision of African Banking Corporation of Zambia Limited and [...]
Out with the Old: South Africa’s Proposed Overhaul of Exchange Controls and the Inclusion of Crypto Assets
by Janice Geel, Associate and Azraa Sidat, Candidate Attorney, reviewed by Natalie Scott, Director and Head of Sustainability On 17 [...]
Do not call me I’ll call you …… South Africa’s 2026 CPA Amendment Regulations: operationalising the national opt‑out regime for direct marketing and shifting day‑to‑day anti‑spam responsibility to the National Consumer Commission
by Ahmore Burger-Smidt, Director and Head of Regulatory The Consumer Protection Act Amendment Regulations, 2026 deliver the long‑awaited operational framework [...]
