Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Incitement to strike
Inciting employees to commit misconduct
When does the conduct of an employee amount to ‘incitement’ justifying disciplinary action?
In order to discipline an employee for inciting employees to commit misconduct, of any form, an employer must be able to show that the employee in question sought to reach and influence the minds of other employees in order to commit a crime or misconduct. In the context of a strike, a shop steward who calls a meeting with a group of non-striking employees in order to query whether they will join the remaining employees in their unlawful strike action cannot be said to have gone far enough to justify dismissal on the basis of incitement.
Engaging in the unlawful strike
In Albion Services CC v CCMA and others (D 275/10) [2013] ZALCD 12 (12 May 2013) the employer’s workforce had divided into two groups, the first group (“group A”) had engaged in an unlawful strike action while the second group (“group B”) had elected to continue working.
Upon engaging in the unlawful strike, management warned the strikers of the unlawfulness of their actions. Subsequent to such warning, a shop steward for a trade union held a meeting with group B. During the meeting the shop steward asked what group B’s intentions were when group A continued with their strike. As a result of his action, the shop steward was charged with incitement to strike and insolence. He was dismissed after an internal disciplinary hearing after being found guilty of the first charge. At arbitration, his dismissal was found to be unfair as the employer had failed to prove incitement.
Upon review, the Labour Court confirmed the finding of the arbitrator finding that there was no evidence suggesting the shop steward did more than merely trying to ascertain the view of the non-striking employees. In order for conduct to constitute incitement, an employee must act in such a manner so that he ‘reached and sought to influence the minds’ of his fellow employees. Calling a meeting merely presented an opportunity to incite which the employee did not exploit.
An employee can be guilty of inciting other employees
An employee can be guilty of inciting other employees to commit misconduct such as participating in an unlawful strike. However, the employer must prove that the employee ‘reached and sought to influence the minds’ of his fellow employees to commit such misconduct. Whether an employee has done so will have to be determined based on the facts of the matter. Merely asking whether employees intended to join an unlawful strike would not be enough. There will clearly have to be an element of persuasion or cajoling on the part of the employee.
Latest News
“All change is good”: potential implications of the proposed changes to taxation of income subject to withholding taxes awarded by South African trusts to foreign beneficiaries
and Benedict Ngobeni - Candidate Attorney Reviewed by Ernest Mazansky - Director, Werksmans Tax (Proprietary) Limited Currently, income arising in [...]
The changing landscape of the Companies Act, 2008: the Second Amendment Bill, 2023
In the wake of the Zondo Commission of Enquiry into State Capture's recommendation that certain provisions in the Companies [...]
A definite end to an infinite loop – the interpretation of section 153(4) of the Companies Act, 71 of 2008
It is evident from recent judgments handed down by the Supreme Court of Appeal (the "SCA") that various provisions [...]
A South African perspective on the role of Pro Bono lawyers
This article was first published in TYL, a publication of the American Bar Association's Young Lawyers Division As a [...]
Labour laws – fairness to all parties
South African labour laws have been deliberately crafted in order to create a protective regulatory environment for employees. Additionally, [...]
Faking sickness in order to attend a political march: You have a huge price to pay
Our labour law allows employees to take paid sick leave when they are sick in order to attend to [...]