Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Offers of employment – don’t take risks
by Jacques van Wyk, Director, Michiel Heyns, Senior Associate, and Danelle Plaatjies, Candidate Attorney
Summary
What constitutes an offer and acceptance for the conclusion of a contract of employment?
Offers of employment – Facts
In the case of Ntsunguzi / M2 Bio Food and Beverage (Pty) Ltd [2022] 6 BALR 629 (CCMA), following a series of interviews, the interviewee received an email from the prospective employer which read “we would like to offer you a position at our company, for a probation period of three months starting 1 October 2021 For this interim period we can offer you R20,000.00 per month as compensation. We look forward to hearing from you”.
The interviewee replied to this correspondence seeking further details concerning the remuneration offered and expressed excitement by stating “Looking forward to hearing from you and definitely looking forward to the 1 October”. The following day the interviewee sent a further email which stated:
“Just following up on the conversation below, I’m expected at the Woodstock office on 1st October and not Houtbay, is that correct?” The interviewee was then advised that the employer was still reviewing candidates and approximately a week later he was informed that another candidate was chosen.
Once an employee has resigned the employee cannot withdraw the resignation unless the employer consents thereto. Read more on Resignation terminates contract of employment and cannot be withdrawn.
Offers of employment acceptance
The commissioner stated that, in order to conclude a binding contract, acceptance must be clear and unequivocal or unambiguous. A counter offer is not sufficient. In this instance, the interviewee unequivocally accepted the offer.
The fact that he did so via email correspondence did not matter and neither did the fact that he requested some clarity about his salary. When he accepted the offer, he became an employee. By not appointing him, the employer breached the contract of employment that was established.
His dismissal was therefore procedurally and substantively unfair.
Conversely, in the matter of Tshiki v Nelson Mandela University [2022] 8 BALR 860 (CCMA), following a recruitment process, the interviewee claimed that he was informed telephonically by an HR consultant of the employer (who thereafter passed away) that he had been successful in his application for a position he applied for.
Whilst being informed of this, he was advised to send his payslip to her in order to finalise the offer.
On his own version, the HR consultant later informed him, that the shortlisting process for the position had been challenged and the offer had been delayed. The interviewee confirmed, in a ‘follow-up’ correspondence, that he was still awaiting the offer.
Thereafter, the interviewee had been told that another candidate had been placed in the position.
In this case, the commissioner found that no contract of employment was concluded as there was – on his own version – no offer and no acceptance.
Legal Principles
In both the Ntsunguzi and the Tshiki matters, the CCMA referred to the Labour Appeal Court’s (“LAC“) decision of Wyeth South Africa (Pty) Ltd v Manqele and others [2005] 6 BLLR 523 (LAC).
In the Wyeth matter, the LAC held that a person who has concluded a contract of employment but has not yet commenced working for the employer, is an employee, for purposes of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (“LRA“).
Ultimately, a factual enquiry had been conducted in both the Ntsunguzi and Tshiki matters to determine whether the principle confirmed in the Wyeth matter had been established, that is, whether a contract of employment had been concluded.
The factual enquiry involves a ‘backward-looking’ process.
As summarised in Young v Barnes Group (2019) 40 ILJ 479 (CCMA), for an employment agreement to be valid, there must be-
- an intention to create a legal relationship;
- offer and acceptance;
- agreement as to the essentials of the contract; and
- consensus as to the rights and duties of the parties.
Importance of Case
Employers are reminded to avoid providing offers of employment if the relevant recruitment processes or details of a vacant post have not been finalised as a valid employment agreement may still be created and enforced through offer and acceptance.
Latest News
Do not call me I’ll call you …… South Africa’s 2026 CPA Amendment Regulations: operationalising the national opt‑out regime for direct marketing and shifting day‑to‑day anti‑spam responsibility to the National Consumer Commission
The Consumer Protection Act Amendment Regulations, 2026 deliver the long‑awaited operational framework for South Africa’s statutory opt‑out regime by establishing [...]
Business Rescue Applications Under Scrutiny: business rescue orders are not there for the taking!
This article considers the recent decision in Trustees, Inkwazi Trust v Skema Holdings (Pty) Ltd and its implications for business [...]
The AI Arms Race and what it means for Competition Law: A new era or new focus
We are not in the habit of writing breathless technology briefings. That is not our role. But the industrial reorganisation [...]
The AI Governance Stack and South Africa’s Draft National AI Policy: An Operational Gap in Search of a Framework
Author's Note I am presently reading Noah M Kenney's Governing Intelligence: Law, Privacy, Security, and Compliance,[1] and it has given [...]
Speak now or forever hold your peace. The draft AI policy has been published and parties have 60 days to comment
by Ahmore Burger-Smidt, Director and Head of Regulatory On 10 April 2026, South Africa's Department of Communications and Digital Technologies [...]
Cracking Down or Catching Up? South Africa’s Approach to Crypto Regulation: Part 4 – Exchange Control Update
by Deon Griessel, Director, Armand Swart, Director, Hlonelwa Lutuli, Associate and Khanyisa Tshoba, Associate In our previous article published on [...]
