Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Market Inquiry: South African Fresh Produce Market
by Ahmore Burger-Smidt, Director and Head of Data Privacy and Cybercrime Practice and member of the Competition Law Practice and Nyiko Mathebula, Associate
The Competition Commission of South Africa (“the Commission“) has published the draft Terms of Reference regarding its intended market inquiry into the Fresh Produce Market. Interested parties have until 25 April 2022 to submit written submissions to the Commission.
The Commission is of the belief that the Fresh Produce Market may have features that impede, distort, or restrict competitiveness within that market. As such, it intends to investigate the whole value chain of the fresh produce industry from the input level to end-user consumption. This includes role players such as –
| LEVEL IN VALUE CHAIN | EXAMPLE |
| INPUTS | Seed & fertilizer companies; farm equipment suppliers; agrochemical companies |
| PRODUCERS | Large‑scale producers and small‑scale growers |
| WHOLESALE | Produce Markets (national fresh produce markets) |
| INTERMEDIARIES | Exporters and processors |
| WHOLESALE‑RETAIL | Distribution centres |
| RETAIL | Formal and informal traders |
| CONSUMERS | Local consumers and foreign market consumers |
Part of the Commission’s concerns centres around the cost of fresh produce (i.e., price) and barriers to entry for fresh produce farmers (especially small‑scale and emerging farmers). On a broad level, the Commission deems it necessary to canvass the following –
- the efficiency of the value chain;
- market dynamics and impact of key inputs for growers;
- small and HDP growers and participation; and
- barriers to entry in relation to the regulatory environment.
Consequently, the comment period presents an opportunity for role players in the fresh produce industry to participate in this process and help shape the focus of the South African Fresh Produce Market Inquiry. In so doing, the eventual thinking and understanding of the issues that the Commission will be investigating can also be shaped.
For more details, contact us at aburgersmidt@werksmans.com or pkrusche@werksmans.com.
Competition Law e-Learning Tool
Find out more about our Competition e-Learning tool.
Latest News
Excessive delay in disciplinary proceedings could render the dismissal unfair
Lethoba and Rand Water (2025) 46 ILJ 2771 (CCMA) by Andre van Heerden - Director and Mikayla Ehrenreich - Candidate Attorney [...]
What’s in a name – Trade marks and Brooklyn Beckham
by Donvay Wegierski, Director What's in a name - Trade marks and Brooklyn Beckham Brooklyn Beckham, son to British born [...]
Not Every Employee Is a Whistleblower (And Not Every Disciplinary Hearing Is Up for Debate)
by Bradley Workman-Davies - Director The Labour Court’s judgment in Modika v Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa and another [...]
Deadlines Are Not Suggestions (And Finality Still Matters)
by Bradley Workman-Davies - Director The Labour Appeal Court’s decision in NUMSA obo Members v Macsteel Service Centres South Africa [...]
Redundancy and the Duty to Consult: Lessons from Tsogo Sun Casinos v SACCAWU
by Jacques van Wyk - Director and Mike Searle - Candidate Attorney Retrenchment is often described as a ‘no-fault’ dismissal, [...]
Your Workforce Is Not Your Property
by Bradley Workman-Davies - Director The Labour Court’s judgment in Man Mining Technical Services (Pty) Ltd v Eagle Creek Investments [...]
