Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Market Inquiry: South African Fresh Produce Market
by Ahmore Burger-Smidt, Director and Head of Data Privacy and Cybercrime Practice and member of the Competition Law Practice and Nyiko Mathebula, Associate
The Competition Commission of South Africa (“the Commission“) has published the draft Terms of Reference regarding its intended market inquiry into the Fresh Produce Market. Interested parties have until 25 April 2022 to submit written submissions to the Commission.
The Commission is of the belief that the Fresh Produce Market may have features that impede, distort, or restrict competitiveness within that market. As such, it intends to investigate the whole value chain of the fresh produce industry from the input level to end-user consumption. This includes role players such as –
LEVEL IN VALUE CHAIN | EXAMPLE |
INPUTS | Seed & fertilizer companies; farm equipment suppliers; agrochemical companies |
PRODUCERS | Large‑scale producers and small‑scale growers |
WHOLESALE | Produce Markets (national fresh produce markets) |
INTERMEDIARIES | Exporters and processors |
WHOLESALE‑RETAIL | Distribution centres |
RETAIL | Formal and informal traders |
CONSUMERS | Local consumers and foreign market consumers |
Part of the Commission’s concerns centres around the cost of fresh produce (i.e., price) and barriers to entry for fresh produce farmers (especially small‑scale and emerging farmers). On a broad level, the Commission deems it necessary to canvass the following –
- the efficiency of the value chain;
- market dynamics and impact of key inputs for growers;
- small and HDP growers and participation; and
- barriers to entry in relation to the regulatory environment.
Consequently, the comment period presents an opportunity for role players in the fresh produce industry to participate in this process and help shape the focus of the South African Fresh Produce Market Inquiry. In so doing, the eventual thinking and understanding of the issues that the Commission will be investigating can also be shaped.
For more details, contact us at aburgersmidt@werksmans.com or pkrusche@werksmans.com.
Competition Law e-Learning Tool
Find out more about our Competition e-Learning tool.
Latest News
Is an agreement referring to unannexed annexures void for vagueness?
The courts have held that at times when agreements are being interpreted, the proper meaning of words may initially appear [...]
Private equity exits: Will the new Competition Commission merger guidelines stifle or encourage investment appetite?
Reviewed by Dominique Arteiro, from a Competition Law perspective, Director. In any private equity investment life cycle, the exit environment [...]
Sub- contract agreements vs the letting of mining rights
It is the ordinary course of business for South African mining right holders ("MRH") to contract with third party service [...]
Parenting is a job for two: The High Court declares the provisions relating to parental leave unconstitutional
and Anna Tchalov, Candidate Attorney In the matter of Van Wyk and Others v The Minister of Employment and Labour [...]
Religious freedom and operational requirements: which one should prevail?
and Nombulelo Bashe, Candidate Attorney Culture is the sum total of the beliefs and traditions of a particular society and [...]
Consequences of employees misrepresenting their qualifications and professional memberships
and Tasreeq Ferreira and Nombulelo Bashe, Candidate Attorneys Issue Whether an employee may be dismissed if he/she misrepresented his/her qualifications [...]