Legal updates and opinions
Authors
News / News
MESSI is a trade mark
By Janine Hollesen and Donvay Wegierski, Directors
In April, the EU court ruled that the degree of similarity between the marks MASSI and MESSI is not sufficiently high to accept that the relevant public may believe that the goods come from the same source. It went further saying that a significant portion of the public would in fact associate the term MESSI with the famous footballer and will therefore perceive MASSI as being conceptually different.
The EU trade mark owner of MASSI for clothing, shoes, bicycle helmets, protective clothing and gloves had previously opposed Barcelona and Argentinian football player Messi’s application for MESSI due to their visual and phonetic similarity in 2013 which opposition was upheld in the first round. The appeal court overturned the ruling allowing Messi’s marks to be registered. With the FIFA 2018 WORLD CUP underway – with a rather dubious start for Messi – this successful appeal favouring Messi is no doubt welcomed.
If you would like to learn more about Intellectual Property please visit our practice area page.
Latest News
Resignation terminates contract of employment and cannot be withdrawn, unless employer consents thereto
by Jacques van Wyk, Director, Michiel Heyns, Senior Associate, and Kelly Sease, Candidate Attorney Withdrawal of an employee's resignation Whether [...]
Offers of employment – don’t take risks
by Jacques van Wyk, Director, Michiel Heyns, Senior Associate, and Danelle Plaatjies, Candidate Attorney Summary What constitutes an offer and [...]
When must your medical scheme pay for treatment?
by Helen Michael, Director and, Raisah Mahomed, Candidate Attorney On 26 August 2022, the High Court in Pretoria handed down [...]
Not every crime is a cybercrime – The dichotomy of cyber-enabled crimes and cybercrimes
The global adoption of digital technology is rapidly increasing, which increase has caused an evolution in criminal behaviour resulting in [...]
Breaking set stone – exceptional circumstances and the variation of Competition orders
by Ahmore Burger-Smidt, Director and Head of Data Privacy and Cybercrime Practice and member of the Competition Law Practice, and [...]
The Constitutional Court has tightened the noose on the doctrine of common purpose.
by Sandile July, Director, Sandile Tom, Director and, Benedict Ngobeni, Candidate Attorney Doctrine of common purpose The principles underpinning the [...]
