Legal updates and opinions
News / News
National Minimum Wage Bill tabled in Parliament
By Jacques van Wyk, Director and Chelsea Roux, Candidate Attorney
The Portfolio Committee on Labour met in January 2019 to discuss a possible amendment to the National Minimum Wage Act 9 of 2019 (the “NMW Act“) as contained in the National Minimum Wage Bill (the “Bill“). The Bill is meant to correct a cross-reference in the NMW Act and to provide for matters related therewith. The error in the NMW Act is found in section 17(4) which incorrectly makes a cross-reference to section 4(6) instead of section 4(8). Section 4(8) makes it an unfair labour practice for an employer to unilaterally change wages, hours of employment and other employment conditions. This is meant to have retrospective effect as of 1 May 2017. However, the NMW Act incorrectly makes section 4(6) retrospective therefore requiring the minimum wage to be back-dated to 1 May 2017. The purpose of the Bill is thus to ensure that section 17(4) refers to section 4(8). By correcting the cross-reference to section 4(6) it counteracts an argument that the minimum wage has retrospective effect. The time for written comments on the amendment of the Bill ended on 15 March 2019. The Bill has now been tabled in Parliament.
Latest News
Is an unfair dismissal claim subject to prescription? If so, does the referral of a dispute to the ccma for conciliation interrupt the running of prescription?
By Jacques van Wyk, Director and Yusha Davidson, Candidate Attorney ISSUE Are claims for unfair dismissal subject to the Prescription [...]
The definition of “worker” in the national minimum wage bill
By: Jacques van Wyk, Director and Andre Van Heerden, Senior Associate and Yusha Davidson, Candidate Attorney The Department of Labour has [...]
Regulations on national minimum wage exemptions
By: Jacques van Wyk, Director and Andre Van Heerden, Senior Associate and Yusha Davidson, Candidate Attorney The National Minimum Wage Bill [...]
The right to a fair hearing trumps the contract of employment
By: Jacques van Wyk, Director and Andre Van Heerden, Senior Associate and Yusha Davidson, Candidate Attorney ISSUE Can an employee be [...]
Automatically unfair dismissals versus legitimate dismissals for operational requirements: the importance of the ‘true reasons’ for the dismissal
By: Jacques van Wyk, Director, Andre van Heerden, Senior Associate and, Unathi Jukuda, Candidate Attorney ISSUE Whether, in dismissing employees, the [...]
Corroborative evidence is required to establish intoxication
By: Jacques van Wyk, Director, Andre van Heerden, Senior Associate and, Unathi Jukuda, Candidate Attorney ISSUE Whether an employer can dismiss [...]
