Legal updates and opinions
News / News
National Minimum Wage Bill tabled in Parliament
By Jacques van Wyk, Director and Chelsea Roux, Candidate Attorney
The Portfolio Committee on Labour met in January 2019 to discuss a possible amendment to the National Minimum Wage Act 9 of 2019 (the “NMW Act“) as contained in the National Minimum Wage Bill (the “Bill“). The Bill is meant to correct a cross-reference in the NMW Act and to provide for matters related therewith. The error in the NMW Act is found in section 17(4) which incorrectly makes a cross-reference to section 4(6) instead of section 4(8). Section 4(8) makes it an unfair labour practice for an employer to unilaterally change wages, hours of employment and other employment conditions. This is meant to have retrospective effect as of 1 May 2017. However, the NMW Act incorrectly makes section 4(6) retrospective therefore requiring the minimum wage to be back-dated to 1 May 2017. The purpose of the Bill is thus to ensure that section 17(4) refers to section 4(8). By correcting the cross-reference to section 4(6) it counteracts an argument that the minimum wage has retrospective effect. The time for written comments on the amendment of the Bill ended on 15 March 2019. The Bill has now been tabled in Parliament.
Latest News
Pro Bono Articles
Five tips to optimise your first consultation with an attorney Coercive and Controlling Behaviour in the Domestic Violence Act [...]
FAQ – Opportunities for investors arising from the South African business rescue process
DOWNLOAD THE FAQ GUIDE HERE The South African business rescue process has created the opportunity for investors (local and [...]
Raging against the machine
and Thembelihle Tshabalala, Candidate Attorney, The meteoric rise of artificial intelligence (AI) is generating infinite possibilities and particularly so [...]
Additional obligations on accountable institutions
Following on the recent amendments to the Financial Intelligence Centre Act, 38 of 2001 ("FICA") and most notably, the [...]
The proper interpretation of conflicting provisions in the Income Tax Act
and Luke Magerman, Candidate Attorney A recent tax court judgment added valuable jurisprudence to the often-litigated issue of the interpretation [...]
What is the relevance of s 52 of the MPRDA on retrenchments in terms of section 189 and 189A in the mining industry?
In National Union of Mineworkers v Anglo American Platinum Ltd & others (Amplats), on 15 January 2013, Amplats had [...]
