Legal updates and opinions
News / News
National Minimum Wage Bill tabled in Parliament
By Jacques van Wyk, Director and Chelsea Roux, Candidate Attorney
The Portfolio Committee on Labour met in January 2019 to discuss a possible amendment to the National Minimum Wage Act 9 of 2019 (the “NMW Act“) as contained in the National Minimum Wage Bill (the “Bill“). The Bill is meant to correct a cross-reference in the NMW Act and to provide for matters related therewith. The error in the NMW Act is found in section 17(4) which incorrectly makes a cross-reference to section 4(6) instead of section 4(8). Section 4(8) makes it an unfair labour practice for an employer to unilaterally change wages, hours of employment and other employment conditions. This is meant to have retrospective effect as of 1 May 2017. However, the NMW Act incorrectly makes section 4(6) retrospective therefore requiring the minimum wage to be back-dated to 1 May 2017. The purpose of the Bill is thus to ensure that section 17(4) refers to section 4(8). By correcting the cross-reference to section 4(6) it counteracts an argument that the minimum wage has retrospective effect. The time for written comments on the amendment of the Bill ended on 15 March 2019. The Bill has now been tabled in Parliament.
Latest News
A new Covid 19 code: has anything really changed?
by Anastasia Vatalidis, Head of Labour & Employment, Sandile Tom, Director, and Benedict Ngobeni, Candidate Attorney On the heels of [...]
Affected persons are invited – again – to provide comments on The Code of Conduct for The Banking Association of SA
On 24 June 2022, the Information Regulator of South Africa (Information Regulator) published a notice in terms of section 61(2) [...]
Gerrymandering Healthcare? Certificate of need
The term "gerrymander" is used primarily in the context of shifting the boundaries or borders of voting constituencies in order [...]
Business Rescue Proceedings in South Africa
Business Rescue Proceedings A company should commence business rescue proceedings at the first signs of it being financially distressed, within [...]
To interdict or not to interdict: Parties continue to fall in the same pitfalls
Securing an interdict It has long been held, per Loomcraft Fabrics CC v Nedbank Ltd and another [1996] 1 All [...]
Can a Business Rescue Practitioner and a Curator Bonis hold hands?
The recent High Court judgment in National Director of Public Prosecutions v Knoop N.O and others; National Director of Public [...]
