Legal updates and opinions
News / News
National Minimum Wage Bill tabled in Parliament
By Jacques van Wyk, Director and Chelsea Roux, Candidate Attorney
The Portfolio Committee on Labour met in January 2019 to discuss a possible amendment to the National Minimum Wage Act 9 of 2019 (the “NMW Act“) as contained in the National Minimum Wage Bill (the “Bill“). The Bill is meant to correct a cross-reference in the NMW Act and to provide for matters related therewith. The error in the NMW Act is found in section 17(4) which incorrectly makes a cross-reference to section 4(6) instead of section 4(8). Section 4(8) makes it an unfair labour practice for an employer to unilaterally change wages, hours of employment and other employment conditions. This is meant to have retrospective effect as of 1 May 2017. However, the NMW Act incorrectly makes section 4(6) retrospective therefore requiring the minimum wage to be back-dated to 1 May 2017. The purpose of the Bill is thus to ensure that section 17(4) refers to section 4(8). By correcting the cross-reference to section 4(6) it counteracts an argument that the minimum wage has retrospective effect. The time for written comments on the amendment of the Bill ended on 15 March 2019. The Bill has now been tabled in Parliament.
Latest News
FAQ | Opportunities for investors arising from the South African business rescue process
The South African business rescue process has created the opportunity for investors (local and foreign) to position themselves in order [...]
Explanatory Note
"No right, including the right to strike, is absolute." (AMCU and Others vs Anglo Gold Ashanti and Others) The right [...]
National minimum wage increases for 2022
Adjusted national minimum wage Following a mandatory annual review process, the Minister of Employment and Labour announced increases to the [...]
Earnings threshold increase for 2022
Annual earnings threshold increase for 2022 The Basic Conditions of Employment Act 75 of 1997 ("BCEA") empowers the Minister of [...]
Is a report prepared in terms of S 165(4) of the Companies Act privileged?
by Jones Antunes Director, Danielle Hertz, Associate, and Marisha Krishna, Candidate Attorney This aforesaid is an issue that recently enjoyed [...]
Can’t make head or tail of POPIA? Lessons from Sheburi V Rail Safety Regulator
The Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 The Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 ("POPIA") came [...]
