Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Olympic games: exclusivity and revenue
By: Donvay Wegierski, Director

The protection of the Olympic Symbol, and its torch, flag and anthem is extremely important. According to the Nairobi Treaty on the Protection of the Olympic Symbol, which is an international treaty managed by the World Intellectual Property Office (WIPO) –
“any state that is a member of this treaty is obliged to refuse or to invalidate the registration as mark and to prohibit by appropriate measures the use, as a mark or sign, for commercial purposes of any sign consisting of or containing the Olympic symbol”.
The Olympics generates revenue through trade mark licensing, one of the key benefits of trade mark registration. The recent Winter Olympics in South Korea was an international spectacle with sponsorship and broadcasting rights no doubt the main source of revenue, funding the Games and contributing to sports development worldwide.
Latest News
Chambers Global Rankings – 2024 Edition
Congratulations to all our ranked lawyers for maintaining the Firms' excellence in the global legal fraternity. Ranked across 19 practices [...]
COMESA’s first ever fine for Anti-Competitive Business Practices
By Nkonzo Hlatshwayo Director, Phuti Mashalane Director and Chiara Ferri, Candidate Attorney The COMESA Competition Commission ("CCC") is clamping down [...]
Employment Equity Act: Draft Regulations on Proposed Sectoral Numerical Targets
and Hanán Jeppie, Candidate Attorney On 1 February 2024, the Minister of Employment and Labour, Thembelani Waltermade Nxesi, ("Minister”) published, [...]
Take note and prepare to comment – Proposed Amendments to the COMESA Competition Regulations
and Chiara Ferri, Candidate Attorney On 24 January 2024, the COMESA Competition Commission ("CCC") published its Draft COMESA Competition and [...]
A Snapshot of COP28: the good, the bad and the promising
It has been almost two months since the United Nations ("UN") Climate Change Conference of the Parties to the UN [...]
SARS Binding Private Ruling 399: Replacing an asset shortly after its acquisition under an asset-for-share transaction
and Luke Magerman, Candidate Attorney A recent ruling published by SARS deals with the anti-avoidance implications of the disposal of [...]
