Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Prescription of claims: on-demand loans
A loan which is repayable on demand becomes due the moment it is advanced to the debtor. Accordingly, such a debt will prescribe (or be extinguished) three years after the date on which the loan is advanced, unless prescription is interrupted by an acknowledgment of liability by the debtor or the service on the debtor of any process whereby the lender claims payment of the debt. This was the finding of the Supreme Court of Appeal in Trinity Asset Management (Pty) Ltd v Grindstone Investments (Pty) Ltd (1040/15) [2016] ZASCA 135 (29 September 2016), despite the fact that the loan agreement in question provided that the loan would only be “due and payable” within 30 days from the date of delivery of the lender’s written demand.
The court distinguished between when a debt is “claimable” (ie when it becomes due) and when it is “payable”. The fact that the debtor may be given 30 days following demand within which to repay the loan does not alter the principle that the loan becomes due the moment it is advanced and, therefore, prescription starts running from that date. In this case, the lender had demanded repayment of the loan more than three years after the loan was advanced and the court held that the debt had, by that time, already prescribed.
The court considered the proposition that, if the parties clearly indicate that they intend demand to be a condition precedent for the debt to become due, prescription will only begin to run from the date of demand. However, the court did not feel it was necessary to decide whether this proposition was correct as, in its view, it was far from clear that the parties in this case had such an intention.
Until the courts have provided clarity on whether (and on what terms) parties may agree that an on-demand loan will only become due (and prescription will therefore only commence running) once demand for repayment of the loan has been made, lenders would be well-advised to structure their lending arrangements and internal processes in such a way as to minimize the risk of an on-demand debt owing to them being inadvertently extinguished in circumstances similar to this case.
Click on the link if you’ like to more information on Werksmans expertise in the Banking & Finance sector.
Latest News
Global AI Governance Frameworks in a Diverging World
by Ahmore Burger-Smidt, Director and Head of Regulatory “The biggest lesson learned is we have to take the unintended consequences [...]
Summary of Recently Proposed Legislative Amendments: National Minimum Wage Act and Employment Equity Act
by Andre van Heerden, Director and Mikayla Ehrenreich, Candidate Attorney Introduction On 26 February 2026, the Minister of Employment and Labour [...]
Summary of Recently Proposed Legislative Amendments: Basic Conditions of Employment Act and Unemployment Insurance Act
by Andre van Heerden, Director and Mikayla Ehrenreich, Candidate Attorney Introduction On 26 February 2026, the Minister of Employment and [...]
Summary of Recently Proposed Legislative Amendments: The Labour Relations Act
by Andre van Heerden, Director and Mikayla Ehrenreich, Candidate Attorney Introduction On 26 February 2026, the Minister of Employment and [...]
Take the Job – Not the Clients: Recent Cases Reinforce the Employer’s Right to Protect Its Turf
by Bradley Workman-Davies, Director Restraints of trade remain one of the most frequently litigated issues in South African employment law. [...]
Have Cross-Border Payments for Royalties and Fees Become Less Stringently Controlled?
by Khanyisa Tshoba, Associate and reviewed by Deon Griessel, Director Towards the end of 2024, the Financial Surveillance Department of [...]
