Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Prescription of claims: on-demand loans
A loan which is repayable on demand becomes due the moment it is advanced to the debtor. Accordingly, such a debt will prescribe (or be extinguished) three years after the date on which the loan is advanced, unless prescription is interrupted by an acknowledgment of liability by the debtor or the service on the debtor of any process whereby the lender claims payment of the debt. This was the finding of the Supreme Court of Appeal in Trinity Asset Management (Pty) Ltd v Grindstone Investments (Pty) Ltd (1040/15) [2016] ZASCA 135 (29 September 2016), despite the fact that the loan agreement in question provided that the loan would only be “due and payable” within 30 days from the date of delivery of the lender’s written demand.
The court distinguished between when a debt is “claimable” (ie when it becomes due) and when it is “payable”. The fact that the debtor may be given 30 days following demand within which to repay the loan does not alter the principle that the loan becomes due the moment it is advanced and, therefore, prescription starts running from that date. In this case, the lender had demanded repayment of the loan more than three years after the loan was advanced and the court held that the debt had, by that time, already prescribed.
The court considered the proposition that, if the parties clearly indicate that they intend demand to be a condition precedent for the debt to become due, prescription will only begin to run from the date of demand. However, the court did not feel it was necessary to decide whether this proposition was correct as, in its view, it was far from clear that the parties in this case had such an intention.
Until the courts have provided clarity on whether (and on what terms) parties may agree that an on-demand loan will only become due (and prescription will therefore only commence running) once demand for repayment of the loan has been made, lenders would be well-advised to structure their lending arrangements and internal processes in such a way as to minimize the risk of an on-demand debt owing to them being inadvertently extinguished in circumstances similar to this case.
Click on the link if you’ like to more information on Werksmans expertise in the Banking & Finance sector.
Latest News
Information Regulator bites! Enforcement Notice issued against the SAPS
It was with great shock that the South African society learned about the rape of several women near Krugersdorp [...]
Energy Performance Certificate for commercial buildings
On 13 January 2020, the Minister of Mineral Resources and Energy published a draft Regulation for the Mandatory Display [...]
The implication of the amendments to the Financial Intelligence Centre Act, 38 of 2001
With effect from 19 December 2022, the list of "accountable institutions", as contained in Schedule 1 to the Financial [...]
Trust transparency as a means to combat money laundering: what should trustees know
by Benedict Ngobeni, Candidate Attorney Concerns around money laundering and other illicit financial activities have been gaining traction over [...]
The South African Reserve Bank announces South Africa’s first Deposit Insurance Body
and Siphosethu Zazela, Candidate Attorney The South African Reserve Bank (SARB) announced the establishment of the Corporation for Deposit Insurance (CODI) [...]
Food-focused Market Inquiry Lift Off! The Commission officially launches Fresh Produce Market Inquiry
The Competition Commission ("Commission") has today, 23 March 2023, formally launched the Fresh Produce Market Inquiry (“FPMI”), following the publication [...]
