Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Prudential Authority Issues Guidance on Climate-Related Governance/Risk Practices and Disclosures for Banks
By Slade van Rooyen, Candidate Attorney, reviewed by Natalie Scott, Director and Head of Sustainability
On 10 May 2024, the Prudential Authority (“PA“) issued the “Guidance on climate-related governance and risk practices for banks” (“G2/2024“) and “Guidance on climate-related disclosures for banks” (“G3/2024“), in terms of section 6(5) of the Banks Act 94 of 1990. The guidance notes provide guidance to banks, branches of foreign institutions and controlling companies (collectively, “banks“) regarding the integration of climate risks into banks’ governance and risk management frameworks, and climate-related disclosures, respectively.
G2/2024 places the responsibility for the continuous oversight and management of climate-related risks (“CRRs“) on a bank’s board of directors. The board and senior management of the bank are tasked with identifying CRRs that are material to the bank’s business model, and which may impact on the capital resources and liquidity position of the bank. CRRs must be incorporated and integrated into the bank’s established risk framework, and banks must demonstrate that these risks have been considered under the relevant traditional risk categories. A bank must consider CRRs in its Internal Capacity Adequacy Assessment Process (“ICAAP“), and may use scenario analysis and stress testing as a supplementary risk and capital tool for identifying, monitoring and assessing risk as part of the ICAAP, so as to develop a “forward-looking view” of CRRs. Furthermore, the internal policies of banks must be adapted, and training programmes implemented, to ensure that the impact of CRRs on the bank’s risk profile is properly understood. G2/2024 sets out the responsibilities of the bank’s compliance and internal audit functions in respect of CRRs, and deals with the importance of transition plans as a tool for managing CRRs and achieving commitments to climate targets.
G3/2024 stresses the imperative for financial institutions to –
“build the necessary capacity and capabilities to identify, assess, manage, and disclose climate-related risks and opportunities within their existing risk management and governance frameworks, including any metrics or targets developed by the bank”.
G3/2024 sets out the overarching requirements for disclosures of CRRs and opportunities, including that disclosures should, inter alia, focus on relevant and material information, and be complete, objective, accurate, clear, balanced, understandable, consistent and timely. Banks must, accordingly, ensure that their CRR disclosure reports meet the aforementioned criteria, and disclose how CRRs and opportunities impact on the business model, strategy and decision-making of the bank. Furthermore, banks are required to –
- “describe the climate resilience of the bank’s strategy and business model taking into account climate-related scenario analysis”;
- “describe the extent to which, and how, processes for identifying, assessing, prioritising, managing, mitigating and monitoring climate-related risks are integrated into and inform the bank’s overall risk management”;
- “disclose metrics and targets that enable stakeholders to evaluate the bank’s exposure, measurement and management of climate-related risks”; and
- “disclose Scope 1, 2, and 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in accordance with the Greenhouse Gas Protocol, unless legally required to use a different method by another jurisdictional authority or exchange where the bank is listed”.
The PA has encouraged financial institutions to be “proactive” with regard to CRR management and disclosures, particularly in light of the potential for climate-related disclosures to become mandatory in future.
Latest News
Is the alleged transfer of an insolvent business indeed a transfer as a going concern
Mokhele & Others v Schmidt & Others (JS 564/11) 19 May 2016 ISSUE Whether the alleged transfer of an [...]
Can a strike be rendered unlawful as a result of unlawful acts including acts of violence?
National Union of Food Beverage Wine Spirits and Allied Workers (NUFBWSAW) and others v Universal Product Network (Pty) Ltd In [...]
Is a collective agreement valid and binding, despite a dispute as to the authority of those purporting to conclude the agreement?
South African Airways (Soc) Ltd & another v National Transport Movement & others (Case no: J1872/2015, 12 May 2016) [...]
The meaning of the term ‘pay back’ in a settlement agreement
Genrec Engineering (Pty) Ltd v Metal and Engineering Industries Bargaining Council and Others [2016] ZALCJHB 213 (17 June 2016) ISSUE [...]
The impact of Mitchell judgement on purchases of immovable property from an insolvent estate
In a recent judgement, of City Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality v PJ Mitchell (38/2015) (2015) ZASCA, the Supreme Court of Appeal ruled that [...]
Tread carefully when merging: tribunal imposes massive fine for failure to notify
In the intricate process of acquiring another business or forming a joint venture, firms often forget to check whether the [...]
