Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Prudential Authority Issues Guidance on Climate-Related Governance/Risk Practices and Disclosures for Insurers
By Slade van Rooyen, Candidate Attorney, reviewed by Natalie Scott, Director and Head of Sustainability
On 10 May 2024, the Prudential Authority (“PA“) issued Guidance Notice 1 of 2024: “Guidance on climate-related governance and risk practices for insurers” (“Guidance Notice 1“) and Guidance Notice 2 of 2024: “Guidance on climate-related disclosures for insurers” (“Guidance Notice 2“). The guidance notices provide guidance to insurers regarding the integration of climate-related risks into insurers’ governance and risk management frameworks, and climate-related disclosures, respectively.
Guidance Notice 1 places the responsibility for the effective governance of climate-related risks (“CRRs“) on an insurer’s board of directors. The board and senior management of the insurer are tasked with the review and oversight of CRR management systems and the implementation of climate-related policies. An insurer’s Own Risk Solvency Assessment (“ORSA“) is regarded as a “useful tool” to assess the adequacy of the insurer’s Enterprise Risk Management framework and capital position in light of CRRs. Insurers may use scenario analysis and stress testing as a supplementary risk and capital tool for identifying, monitoring and assessing risk, and scenarios should be designed with a “forward-looking perspective“. Furthermore, the internal policies of insurers must be adapted, and training programmes implemented, to ensure that the impact of CRRs on the insurer’s risk profile is properly understood. Guidance Notice 1 sets out the responsibilities of the insurer’s compliance, actuarial and internal audit functions in respect of CRRs, and deals with the importance of transition plans as a tool for managing CRRs and achieving commitments to climate targets.
Guidance Notice 2 stresses the imperative for insurers to –
“build the necessary capacity and capabilities to assess, manage, and disclose climate-related risks and opportunities within existing risk management and governance frameworks, including any metrics or targets developed by the insurer”.
Guidance Notice 2 sets out the overarching requirements for disclosures of CRRs and opportunities, including that disclosures must, inter alia, focus on relevant and material information, and be complete, objective, accurate, clear, balanced, understandable, consistent and timely. Insurers must, accordingly, ensure that their CRR disclosure reports meet the aforementioned criteria, and disclose how CRRs and opportunities impact on the business model, strategy and decision-making of the insurer. Furthermore, insurers are required to –
- “describe the climate resilience of the insurer’s strategy and business model taking into account climate-related scenario analysis”;
- “describe the extent to which, and how, processes for identifying, assessing, prioritising, managing, mitigating and monitoring climate-related risks are integrated into and inform the insurer’s overall risk management”;
- “disclose metrics and targets that enable stakeholders to evaluate the insurer’s exposure, measurement and management of climate-related risks”; and
- “disclose Scope 1, 2, and 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in accordance with the Greenhouse Gas Protocol, unless legally required to use a different method by another jurisdictional authority or exchange where the insurer is listed”.
The PA has encouraged insurers to be “proactive” with regard to CRR management and disclosures, particularly in light of the potential for climate-related disclosures to become mandatory in future.
Latest News
Data protection and privacy regulation: A roundup of developments in Africa in 2021
Data protection, cybercrimes and/or cybersecurity laws The increase in internet penetration in Africa has made it easier to collect, use [...]
Who was worse: The Attorney or the Legal Practice Council?
Roll of attorneys In a matter recently heard before the Western Cape High Court, erstwhile attorney Gerrit Smit Van Wyk [...]
Shareholders stuck between a rock and a hard place
Companies Act 71 of 2008 Brief overview of Section 163 Introduction There are instances where the Companies Act 71 of [...]
Who appoints the substitute BRP? A look into the meaning of Section 139(3) of the Companies Act
Section 139(3) of the Companies Act Who has the power to appoint a business rescue practitioner's replacement, in circumstances where [...]
The metaverse and data privacy: Will regulation keep up?
What is the metaverse? On 28 October 2021, Facebook Inc.'s chief executive officer Mark Zuckerberg announced the rebranding of his [...]
Relief from oppressive or prejudicial conduct in terms of the Companies Act 71 of 2008
Section 163 of the Companies Act 71 of 2008 In any corporate environment, the authority of the board of directors, [...]
